This is an excerpt from The Silent INVASION of YOUR Town. View Ben’s full interview on the Dangerous Info podcast here: https://treeoflibertysociety.com/the-silent-invasion-of-your-town/

Get the book the powers that shouldn’t be are afraid for you to read at https://treeoflibertysociety.com/invasionbook/.

Help support ad-free content with a one time donation or becoming a member today.

Thank you to our sponsors

https://connollyandsonsconcrete.com/

https://www.dentistry4health.org

http://www.highercallingfirearms.com

http://www.americanappliancehvac.com

https://insurewithcompass.com/sbarlow.html

TRANSCRIPT

Do you know of any towns out there that are standing up and fighting and actually winning

I mean I’m talking just even small towns with 20 000 people that have taken over their boards and they’re running their town the way it should be run the way they want it to be run

There’s got to be some towns out there that are fighting against this secret tyranny you know

Oh for sure there absolutely are

I’m working with city councils in several areas where they’re actually saying you know murdering children murdering unborn babies in our town is a crime

And you know if you have a even if you have a state sponsored Planned Parenthood you are a criminal organization you’re not allowed to be here

We don’t allow fluoride in our water here

We don’t you know there’s also going on the offense of using what the founding father said needed to be used was nullification where we say any official that comes into our city to implement federal gun bans will be arrested

And so I yes I am working with cities that are already implementing that

So isn’t that cool OutKast

We need something like that where you’re at

That’s awesome

Yeah it’s awesome

Thank you

The post Yes, People Are Successfully Implementing Solutions appeared first on Tree of Liberty Society.

This is an excerpt from The Silent INVASION of YOUR Town. View Ben’s full interview on the Dangerous Info podcast here: https://treeoflibertysociety.com/the-silent-invasion-of-your-town/

Get the book the powers that shouldn’t be are afraid for you to read at https://treeoflibertysociety.com/invasionbook/.

Help support ad-free content with a one time donation or becoming a member today.

Thank you to our sponsors

https://connollyandsonsconcrete.com/

https://www.dentistry4health.org

http://www.highercallingfirearms.com

http://www.americanappliancehvac.com

https://insurewithcompass.com/sbarlow.html

TRANSCRIPT

None of this stuff is stopping or slowing even with the new administration in office right now

I don’t know if they’re hip to what’s going on or if they’re down with what’s going on I don’t I don’t know

What are you guys thoughts on that

Well the again if we if we believe that previous elections were rigged then I think we have to recognize that whoever wins is who the powers that shouldn’t be would like to be there

And so they put on this basically a professional wrestling match and maybe making us think like one one side is good and one side is bad and and we’ve got to root for our side

Otherwise the other one’s going to win

And this is something that Caroll Quigley wrote about and is quoted quite often

He’s one of these insiders that bragged about what the conspiracy was doing

And he said that the only thing he disagreed with these globalists were that they wish to remain secret

He felt that they were what they were doing was fantastic

And it’s talked a lot about in that book I mentioned Shadows of Power by James Perloff

But he wrote a book called Tragedy and Hope the history of the world in our time where he lays out this project and he says that what they do what the insiders do is they they make you think that you know that you throw the rascals out and these new people come in and but there’s no shift in policy

But what happens is because what they what he said was they have both parties be virtually indistinguishable in actual practice

And so we think we’ve thrown the rascals out but the same for some reason government still keeps getting bigger

For some reason the globalism still keeps getting in there

And so when we start to step back and recognize how the conspiracy operates and we start to wake up to how what how it’s being implemented then we take personal responsibility

We’re not pushing it off onto somebody else that might be good might be bad

It’s irrelevant if they’re good or bad or not because it’s my responsibility

It’s not their responsibility to protect my freedom

I’ve got to stand up for my freedom

I’ve got to make sure what is my local community doing

How is my state implementing this

And make sure that I am in a part of an organization that is organized together to magnify their efforts to stop the globalism to stop the tyranny from happening on the ground level

The post Does The Current President Know What Is Going On? appeared first on Tree of Liberty Society.

Help support ad-free content with a one time donation or becoming a member today.

Thank you to our sponsors

https://connollyandsonsconcrete.com/

https://www.dentistry4health.org

http://www.highercallingfirearms.com

http://www.americanappliancehvac.com

https://insurewithcompass.com/sbarlow.html

TRANSCRIPT

So now the next thing that they do is they want to manufacture consent, make it look like they got everybody on board with this program before they went along with it.

So why manufacture consent?

The conspiracy’s plans are of course unpopular so that they make it look like it’s popular.

The conspiracies’ agents become ineffective without public favor.

They depend on perceived legitimacy, and if they’re exposed as being the illegitimate people that they are, they lose their power.

It marginalizes, of course, opposing voices.

Everybody’s doing it.

The conspiracy needs the appearance of public support to preserve their legitimacy.

So how do they manufacture that consent?

They encourage the public to not meaninglessly voice their opinions, so the conspiracy can pretend their plan was molded and shaped by the public.

In the state of Utah, just for example, and other states have the same thing, they have this in what’s called Envision Utah, which is an Agenda 21 organization, the Agenda 2030 organization.

And they have these questionnaires, or they get you to fill out online to see which big government solution do you want, so that way they can say, oh, thousands and thousands of people filled these out and we’re going with what made the most sense based on these surveys.

Everybody wants these things.

They pushed people to participate in making these false choices.

There was one, for example, the choices, they actually provided the idea of preserving your property rights, But they equated it to extinction and then they showed, you know, high density housing as this utopia of the future.

They manipulate the data, of course, or outcomes after public participation to approve the conspiracies plan.

They’ll just manipulate the percentages anyways. So they have manufactured consent through supposed voting.

You have the Utah launches their medical marijuana signature drive and of course The governor Cox tells the lawmakers, you know, you guys got to stop pushing these bills without the public support and an input and so they they would have these meetings and so it looked like everybody wanted to have this new program that Set up a list of people that weren’t allowed to have guns because they’re violating federal law, but because everybody wanted it.

And we have this Envision Utah again, they are using these questionnaires to get people to move towards globalization, high density housing, et cetera.

Of course, we have, they’re promoting this new green drivers can save by opting to pay a fee per miles driven.

So the same program that was put out there by the United Nations to not charge you, of course, you shouldn’t be charged to own your vehicle every year anyways, but instead of doing that, because they were saying that they weren’t collecting enough money from electric vehicles and the gas tax, so now we’re going to start charging you for the miles you drive on your electric vehicle, and of course, your gas vehicles as well.

They’re doing this in liberal states like California and Oregon, but in Utah, they will call it the conservative solution to climate change.

And it’s the same exact programs that, of course, these big government states are doing.

And of course, you know, we have these essay contests put out by these Agenda 2030 organizations to give consent of why, you know, this is why I like my community.

So they’re just basically, they’re saying, look at Everybody’s writing these great things about all the things that we’re doing that is increasing government, manufactured consent.

Now, Nelson Mandela is an example of a communist that was, they would use this idea of manufactured consent to give him, in his communist efforts in South Africa, the idea and the perception of legitimacy through consent that they manufactured.

According to the Nelson Mandel’s book, “The Long Walk to Freedom,” he says, “In 1954, we invited all participating organizations and their followers to send suggestions for a freedom charter.

We want everybody’s input in our new freedom charter, even though he’s a communist.

Circulars were sent out to townships and villages all across the country.

If you could make the laws, what would you do?

We’re going to get your consent and your participation, Suggestions for a new constitution were to come from the people themselves and conspirator agents.

All across the country were authorized to seek ideas in writing from everyone in their area.

The charter would be a document born of the people. Like other enduring political documents, such as the American Declaration of Independence, the French Declaration of the Rights of Man, the Illuminati, the Jacobins written by, and the commonest manifesto, the freedom charter, is a mixture of practical goals and poetic language.

So you have one good thing, and you sandwich it together with these two satanic conspiracy documents as if they’re all the same.

And so that they were pushing towards this, of course, conspiracy-approved charter that made it look like everybody was on board with.

The post What They Don’t Want You to Know About Manufactured Consent! appeared first on Tree of Liberty Society.

Help support ad-free content with a one time donation or becoming a member today.

Thank you to our sponsors

https://connollyandsonsconcrete.com/

https://www.dentistry4health.org

http://www.highercallingfirearms.com

http://www.americanappliancehvac.com

https://insurewithcompass.com/sbarlow.html

TRANSCRIPT

So the controlled argument, false concepts used for this tactic is, of course, only approved narratives are allowed.

When you look in the controlled media, whether it’s left or right, there’s only acceptable narratives.

The fact that they are facing conspiracy, for example, is not one of the accepted narratives.

It’s always about those darn leftists or those RINOS.

It’s never the fact that there’s actual conspiracy working to destroy liberty.

We have the strawman argument and we have false choices.

So these are the three that we’re going to get into right now explaining what that means, the approved narratives.

An example of an improved narrative, right?

We have these individuals who are the choices that are presented to us.

These are the acceptable narratives.

We have scientific consensus.

The earth’s climate is warming.

And we have experts agree that the Inflation Reduction Act accomplishes a lot for small business and working families.

And then you get into the opposite, false opposition left and right with that.

And so this gets you into your corners of left versus right.

If we don’t support this, the Democrats are going to go off the deep end.

And so we’ve got to support whatever the Republicans are doing to stop these things like the Inflation Reduction Act or the conservative solution to climate change.

And so it makes it look like The actual conclusion is legitimate.

It’s just the way that we get there is where the debate is.

And so that third option of, no, the conclusion with what this is based on is a complete fraud to begin with, the third option.

We also have the straw man, the controlled argument.

And this attempts to distract from and discredit an opponent’s beliefs by presenting them in an unfair and actually an inaccurate light.

So to we’re going to, we have a little cartoon here, little comic that lays this out where you have the first individual saying, um, you want to go get some hamburgers?

Strawman says, can we get some pizza?

So the reaction, the straw man is what? You’re saying that we should only ever eat pizza?

That we should just burn down all hamburger stores?

No, that’s a very inaccurate representation of what I said, right?

Because you didn’t want hamburgers that one time. the straw man is you never want hamburgers for the rest of your life and that we need to destroy anybody that sells hamburgers and so that’s that’s an example of a straw man argument that is used by the conspiracy to discredit individuals they’ll say something like if there’s a conspiracy they’re going to say oh you think everyone’s the conspirator as opposed you know instead of saying well of course there are conspiracies that’s just a fact.

They want to discredit the idea that a conspiracy even exists by making it look like you think everybody is a conspirator.

Then we have false choices, the argument using purposely hidden assumptions to control others’ perceived options.

They frame the debate to offer a narrowed set of options when in fact, other and of course better ways actually exist.

And often the choices are marketed as opposing but are not significantly different.

They accept the premise and they’re just arguing on how to get to that end premise, right?

And so we have examples of how you’re going to protect yourself from the coronavirus.

And I’m not a lawyer.

I can’t answer your question about legislation, said the legislator that’s writing the bill.

If you don’t vote Republican, the Democrats will win.

Are you voting Republican or Democrat. These false choices that are out there.

So the false choices, Republican versus Democrat, right? Of course, if you don’t vote Republican, the Democrats are going to win. It’s a false choice, not recognizing that they’re both on the same team.

Of course, the conspiracy is going to approve that narrative. Ivermectin versus the vaccine.

How are we going to fight COVID, right?

Well, the fact that that’s they’re both agreeing that COVID is a problem as opposed to the flu, that and there was no actually increased deaths.

So there’s no reason to treat the situation any differently than you normally would, but they wanna make it about the COVID is legitimate and so are you gonna get vaccinated or are you gonna get the Ivermectin or something else?

It’s still the preconceived notion that the coronavirus is a real problem.

And of course, the conspiracy is going to approve this argument because it makes everybody agree on the narrative.

So then we also have false choices, working isn’t, capitalism isn’t working, you have stop the steal, my body, my choice, how vaccine foes co -opted the abortion, rallying, cry, you have children, protect children, not guns, my body, my choice.

And so all of these different things out there where they have these fake arguments where if you’re against abortion, if you’re in support of life, that means you’re not in favor of choice or you’re not in favor of agency, etc.

And so if you like the Second Amendment, you want to protect your family, you want to protect your children, that means you’re against children.

And so they have these false choices out there.

The post How The Conspiracy Tricks You With False Choices! appeared first on Tree of Liberty Society.

Help support ad-free content with a one time donation or becoming a member today.

Thank you to our sponsors

https://connollyandsonsconcrete.com/

https://www.dentistry4health.org

http://www.highercallingfirearms.com

http://www.americanappliancehvac.com

https://insurewithcompass.com/sbarlow.html

TRANSCRIPT

And so then we see the political theater, where on TV, you have the Democrats and Republicans pretending to fight each other.

They’re going to argue and they’re going to say that the other side hates with the other side hates freedom and they’re, you know, we’ve just got to be whatever side you’re on, you get to pick one because this is a real battle.

Whereas behind the scenes, they’re actually helping each other.

They’re actually on the same side.

Now they’re not just friends.

They’re actually promoting and working on the same agenda together and we just don’t realize it because we’re looking at the words as opposed to the fruit.

So, we’re going to kind of look at an example, a specific example of political theater.

We’re going to start with something that happened in the past, make it a little bit easier for us to kind of accept the fact that we were probably fooled.

And so, a lot of people, right, you’re going to say here, “Well, the lesser of two evils.”

Of course, George Bush, we didn’t agree with everything.

We can’t have And so at least he’s better than Bill Clinton. And so we’ve got to choose the lesser of these two evils.

And so a great speaker on the constitution, man by the name of Stephen Pratt, who’s no longer with us, actually gave a presentation, giving these two men as examples of what happens when we choose the lesser of two evils based on what we see on TV.

What is the media feeding us of who’s the lesser of two evils.

And answering, asking ourselves these questions, who increased the debt more?

So we’re going to find out who’s the lesser of these two evils.

It was actually George W. Bush that increased the debt more.

Who spent more money unconstitutionally?

It was actually George W. Bush that spent more money unconstitutionally than Bill Clinton.

Who grew government more?

By a long shot, it was George W. Bush more than Bill Clinton.

Who sent more troops into UN wars?

Again, George W. Bush.

Who attacked the Second Amendment more?

That one, you might have a little bit of a, you know, back and forth on that one.

Who got the feds more involved in education?

George W. Bush.

Who defended abortion more?

Abortion rights actually expanded and more money, more funding from the government went to abortion under Bush than actually Clinton.

Who had more globalists in his cabinet?

Shockingly enough, maybe to some of you, it was actually George W. Bush that had more globalists in his cabinet than even Bill Clinton.

That pesky, horrible Democrat that was just an immoral person that was trying to take our guns and was working with China as a horrible as a person he was. If you’re judging it on these things, you’re going to say that actually Bill Clinton was the lesser of two evils.

But that’s the false argument.

It’s not about the lesser of two evils because we’re not told the full story.

We need to understand that it’s a distraction because both of these men are on the same team.

They’re both fighting for world government.

They’re both working to destroy the liberty and independence of this nation.

And so fighting about who’s the worse or who’s the better is a distraction that benefits the conspiracy because you’re still picking between two globalists.

So both of them are going to get you to where the conspiracy wants you to be.

So left, right, it’s the same evil outcome.

Is it the lesser of two evils?

Now, of course not. We have this cartoon here that is just like, you know, the turkey choosing between the axe and the machete on which way he’s going to die.

Now, we want to compare, right?

Because what is the propaganda that gets us to believe the lesser of two evils, and that one person is less evil than another?

Leading up to the first Bush administration when he was running for office, they would have these debates, and he would present himself as being very anti-global globalism and pro-American independence.

And so let’s look at this.

Let’s see what does he say, what are his words?

But we can’t be all things to all people in the world, Jim.

And I think that’s where maybe the vice president I began to have some differences.

I’m worried about over committing our military around the world.

I want to be judicious in this use.

You mentioned Haiti, I wouldn’t have sent troops to Haiti.

I I think it was a mission worthwhile. It was a nation -building mission, and it was not very successful.

It cost us billions, a couple of billions of dollars, and I’m not so sure democracy is any better off in Haiti than it was before.

I’m not so sure the role of the United States is to go around the world and say, “This is the way it’s got to be.”

We can help.

And maybe it’s just our difference in government, the way we view government.

I mean, I want to empower people.

I don’t want to help people help themselves not have government tell people what to do.

I just don’t think it’s the role of the United States to walk into a country and say, “We do it this way, so should you.”

So we see, this is the narrative that they want you to think that he’s like, you know, this is just a difference in our philosophy of government.

You believe and we should be the policemen of the world and I think that we should empower people.

And so he’s saying that he’s anti-globals, these pro, you know, just keeping America out of the affairs of the world, no, we’re not the world’s policemen, but what’s the actual record, right?

He had five nation building, United Nations approved wars.

He did more than the previous administration.

So clearly what he was saying, his words were different than his fruits, as we’re supposed to judge.

And so of course, right, as if there was a difference.

After when Obama got into office, you have these billboards saying, do you miss me yet?

It was just a more of the same, not understanding that, right?

The same thing, we look at the national debt, continues to go up each president.

The Planned Parenthood, spending money on abortions continue to go up, no matter what.

Taxpayer money to the United Nations, global government continues to go up.

And so we need to start to under… because, you know, the media is attacking him, that must mean he’s doing a good thing.

And so therefore we have to support this new hero that is getting attacked by the conspiracy, right?

The conspiracy hates me, but behind the scenes, you know, it was just a stunt that made people think that he was a good guy, that the conspiracy hated.

And so this is one of those examples. We’re gonna go over again, the public image versus the actual record, the fruits that we’re supposed to judge by.

And so, you know, just some background like myself, this was a hard thing for me to accept because Ronald Reagan was the president when I was a kid growing up and I just, you know, loved his talks.

And I was like in the second grade and my dad pulled me out of school and we’re gonna go to the state Capitol, we’re gonna hear president Reagan speak.

And so you got the nostalgia, you have that, you’re hearing their words and you’re like, yeah, that’s exactly right.

And you find it really hard to believe that they would be doing something, not just not living up to the rhetoric, but the complete opposite of the rhetoric.

So let’s see what Reagan, what is the public image of Reagan and then compare it to the record.

This is the issue of this election.

Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American Revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves.

The full power of centralized government.

This was the very thing the founding fathers sought to minimize.

They knew that governments don’t control things.

A government can’t control the economy without controlling people, and they know when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose.

First of all, I think you must have some principles you believe in.

In mine, I happen to believe in the people and believe that the people are supposed to be dominant in our society, that they, not government, are to have control of their own affairs to the greatest extent possible with an orderly society?”

Well, Johnny, I think that one of the things is that people keep looking at government for the answer and government’s the problem.

“Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall.”

So you have the rhetoric of an anti -communist, tear down this wall, government’s the problem, not the solution.

I believe in empowering the people.

That’s what we think of when we think of Ronald Reagan.

But there’s a fantastic book called “The Insiders” by John F. McManus.

I encourage you to all get a copy of it.

And look, it goes into even more detail than I’m able to go tonight on the record.

But I think it’s important for us to be able to go over that.

What’s the real Reagan?

What’s the real record of this man?

And not just once he became president some people will say well yeah he was scared because of that assassination attempt on him again right that false hero going back to even being governor of California the record is the same started as governor of California he attended the Bohemian Grove rituals that we mentioned in the previous boot camps as governor he raised taxes introduced the communist Manifesto Plank of the graduated income tax, he introduced tax withholding from paycheck.

So basically making every single employer in the state of California an agent of the government taking money out of every individual’s pocket, instead of them having to actually write a check to the government and realize how much they’re being manipulated and stolen from every single month.

Raised sales taxes and taxes on business. So even as governor of California, his spending increased more than the other states, including a 61 % in communist socialist welfare spending.

He attacked, of course, Jimmy Carter when he was running for president for having CFR, council on formulations and trilateralists in his cabinet.

But then after winning his first primary In the 1980 election, he replaced his campaign manager with a member of the Council on Formulations and globalist William Casey.

And then he appointed Casey as the head of the CIA once he became president.

He ran ads that were critical of George Bush’s seniors at membership in the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Formulations.

But then after, of course, winning the nomination, he stated that he would pick a running mate with his values.

And who did he pick with his values?

The CFR trilateralist, George Herbert Walker Bush. He also appointed council and formulations members, Ambassador Ann Armstrong, Senator Howard Baker and Henry Kissinger as his foreign policy advisors, globalist as his foreign policy advisors.

Then on election day, he appointed CFR members as secretary of treasury and secretary of commerce.

Then after stating that he opposed the trilateral commission because they were soft on national defense, he appointed a trilateral member as the secretary of defense.

The real Reagan, right?

We see he’s just five months into his administration.

His cabinet was packed with 257 members of the council on foreign relations.

In senior positions, such as heads of state and defense departments, he backed the US taxpayer bailout of the Soviet satellite of Poland as Polish citizens were being imprisoned for supporting freedom.

The Soviet Union wouldn’t have lasted as long as it did if it was not for Ronald Reagan.

Authorized the funding for nuclear steam turbines for the Soviet satellite of Romania and a steel plant for communist China.

He sold arms to communist China.

But when the free people of Taiwan wanted help, he denied it to them.

He campaigned to cut the budget by $13 billion.

In office, he actually increased it by $110 billion, and then passed the largest tax increase in history up to that point of $227 billion.

It doesn’t sound like much of an anti -communist, anti-globalist when you look at his fruit versus his words.

Now let’s look at another organization, one of these people, the National Rifle Association that states that it’s there to protect your Second Amendment rights.

I think it’s known, but I think it’s good to illustrate what is the public image of the National Rifle Association.

In a recent closed door speech to donors, politicians, and media, Bill Clinton spoke about American gun owners.

Quote, “A lot of these people, all they’ve got is they’re hunting, then they’re fishing, or they’ve been listening to this stuff for so long that they believe it all,” unquote.

And we all remember Barack Obama’s 2008 comments to a room of San Francisco elites.

Quote, “It’s not surprising, then they get bitter. They cling to guns or religion.” Unquote

The arrogance of their superiority requires this reminder.

They don’t rule us.

They don’t give us rights.

We grant them power.

They don’t make us safe.

We pay to protect them.

They don’t make us free.

We’re free already. And as long as we have the Second Amendment, we always will be.

We are America, and our politicians are only as powerful as we, the people, allow them to be break in our doors, seize our guns, destroy our property, and even injure or kill us.

Aren’t you concerned when you say Nazi bucket helmets, government thugs, kicking down doors, killing maiming people?

Aren’t you inciting people?

Aren’t you willing now to apologize for the tone of this letter?

Those words are not far.

In fact, they’re a pretty close description of what’s happening in the real world.

Wow, look at that hero, man.

He is sticking it to him.

He is calling out those pesky Democrats as those gun grabbers that they are, and that they’re there to protect your God-given rights.

And that, oh my, look at, look at, he is calling out the government for being the jack-booted thugs that they are.

And he is standing up to that liberal Tim Russert.

Man, he is gonna show him what’s up.

That’s the public image.

Again, words versus fruits.

So we look at the real NRA, according to their own records, their own words.

They received government funding from their inception in the 1800s all the way up till the 1970s.

In the 1920s, they actually pushed for gun control measures in nine states requiring a permit to carry a gun.

Require the NRA, before the NRA gets involved, there’s no permit.

You don’t have to get government permission to carry a gun.

NRA gets involved and they push a bill that says you need government permission to carry a gun.

And a waiting period and a record of purchase going to the government.

So because of the NRA, we now have records of who purchases guns.

They lobbied to ban mail order sales of guns in 1967.

Prior to 1967 and the NRA’s pushing of a bill, you could buy a gun just right over the mail. In the 1968, they lobbied for tracking of guns and banning the shipment across state lines unless you were licensed, you got government permission to do so. In their own publication,

The American Rifleman, in 1968, they bragged about their involvement of pushing more government intrusion into your right of self -defense, saying, “The NRA supported the NRA.”

…through amendment would put new teeth into the national and federal firearms acts, bragging about their taking away your right to defend yourself. Further on, it says the NRA supported the Federal Firearms Act of 1938, which regulates interstate and foreign commerce in firearms and pistol or revolver ammunition, not just guns, but in government control of the ammunition itself.

The NRA supported the original Dodd bill to amend the Federal Firearms Act in regard to handguns when it was introduced as Senate Bill 1975 in August of 1963.

Can you believe this?

So the real NRA we have here, again, the same guy that was on Tim Russert saying, you know, these guys are jack-booted thugs.

So we have the free speech zones and now the NRA, who’s supposed to be supporting your Second Amendment, is saying we want you to have Second Amendment free zones, where you’re not allowed to be able to protect yourself.

We think it’s reasonable to expect full enforcement of federal firearms laws by the federal government.

That’s why we support Project Exile, providing five years federal prison for violations such as having a folding stock or bayonet.

The NRA wants you to spend five years in federal prison for simply having a stock that folds or a knife at the end of your gun.

This is the the guys standing up against Jackbooted thugs. The Constitution authorizes zero restrictions on your right of self-defense, but the NRA, promoting themselves as defending the Second Amendment, wants to destroy the Second Amendment and is working to destroy it.

Now, they’re actually, you know, back after that with the Patriot Act after the 9 /11 attack on the Twin Towers, the demolition of the Twin Towers, they actually opposed gun owners and expanding the government’s powers in the Unconstitutional Patriot Act.

You had Rand Paul actually introduce legislation to stop this and the NRA opposed Rand amendment saying there have been no reports of the current Patriot Act being abused, being abused, the whole thing’s in abuse.

With respect to firearms records, however, supporters suggest a far -fetched scenario in which every firearm sales record in the country, tens or hundreds of millions of documents dating back to 1968, could be sought.

Of course, it’s being put into databases at this time, and and so they opposed actually preserving your right to privacy and your right to defend yourself.

They backed language that allows the BATF now to get access to every gun owner’s purchase going back decades.

So now we go into Glenn Beck as the next false opposition.

Just some background.

Glenn Beck in 2003, his company merged with Simon and and Schuster and ViacomCBS.

Then in 2006 and 2008 he had his own CNN who’s a corporate member of the Council on Foreign Relations program.

2008 to 2011 he had his own FOX which is also a corporate member of the Council on Foreign Relations program and then Glenn Beck promotes conspiracy outlets regularly by hosting and the articles from the New Yorker, Washington Post, USA Today and others and even has people on his show that are members of the Council on Foreign Relations.

And he also just as a side note spoke at the CPAC convention in 2019 and other years.

So let’s look at Glenn Beck actually in his own words.

What does he say?

So people know his record, so let’s look at what he says himself.

I think the bailout is the right thing to do.

100 billion dollars that you’re hearing about now is not only, I believe, necessary, it is also not nearly enough.

Well, folks, we are getting new hints that President Obama may be increasingly open to the idea of a brand new national sales tax on everything you buy.

They call it a VAT, a value -added tax.

But in the scheme of things, I think it’s fair to look at a value -added tax.

Will Republicans hand the left a big, vat victory?

The subtitle reads, “Mitt Romney won’t rule out the possibility of imposing a tax.”

Dan Mitchell, the Cato Institute, joins us now.

You say that Americans should fight VAT toward last and dying breath.

Every candidate running for president should have to sign in blood that they will never allow this European tax system to destroy the American — America’s fiscal future.

We can bring the country back.

You have to have a national sales tax.

I actually agree with you.

I want a 2 % VAT.

I want a 2 % VAT.

I’ve probably heard that President Bush yesterday acknowledged for the very first time the existence of secret CIA prisons.

Thank God.

It’s these types of things, the stuff we never usually hear about unless we read the New York Times, that actually makes me feel more secure.

I want a Jack Bauer out there.

I love seeing cops doing bag checks on subway stations.

I love seeing cops doing bag checks on subway stations.

What we’re talking about is waterboarding and whether or not you’re morally in favor of waterboarding or not, it is a far cry from torture.

And it’s going to take somebody who sits in front of Congress who’s not afraid of them anymore and does what Jack Bauer did and That is, yes, I did torture, and I’m proud of it.

I’m for the bailout bill.

It is going to cause us great pain if we don’t have it.

He’s reminded us over and over again that President Bush was in office when Tarp bailout happened.

Well, we were all against that.

We were all against that.

Well, he says, I’m going to get every penny back from those greedy bankers, and most people cheer as I do.

I didn’t want them to get the money in the first place.

Bush started the bailouts.

Yes, he did.

Hated him for it.

I will always tell you the truth, even when it hurts me personally.

Here’s the problem.

I mean, everybody will say, “Oh, that Glenn Beck, he’s a conservative.

He just loved the Bush administration.”

No, I didn’t.

I did say the same things about George W. Bush.

I did complain about his out-of-control spending.

I did complain about his abandoning free market principles to save the free market system.

I did complain constantly. 11 ,687.

That is the number the Dow Jones closed at yesterday.

That number is the highest ever.

Our budget deficit has actually shrunk by 22 .3 % since last year.

The economy is in fine shape.

Two things, two things here.

This is why I like George W. Bush.

This is why I like George W. Bush.

President Bush is a man who personally feels the pain of every lost soldier.

Those weapons of mass destruction gotta be somewhere.

He feels the pain of every wounded hero, every lonely, grieving parent this war has caused.

Nope, no weapons over there.

But above all, I can tell you that the president has incredible passion and resolve.

Maybe under here.

Any of these 9 /11 truthers who I’ve been telling you for years are dangerous.

These truthers are exactly the kind of people who want to rock this nation’s foundation, tear us terrorist apart.

One of the groups that I’ve been warning about for a very long time of these 9 /11 truthers.

This is the kind of group that a Timothy McVeigh would come from.

Senator Santorum voted for the Patriot Act for an expansion of Medicare and for raising the debt ceiling by trillions of dollars.

Senator Rick Santorum from Pennsylvania may just be the Winston Churchill of our day.

One of the criticisms I make is to what I refer to as more of a libertarianish right.

Libertarian view is, you know, isolationist from national security point of view.

I don’t pick or choose or back any presidential nominees.

I am throwing my support behind Rick Santorum now.

Please win, Rick.

Please.

Rick, I came on your radio show, and you said…

Now, I said I’m going to ask you 30 questions, but I gave answers to all 30, and then you finished.

And then you finally said, I want to kiss you in the mouth.

That’s what you said.

Santorum once held his nose and voted to fund abortions.

And Romney once openly and gleefully endorsed them.

I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country.

And I think this is the guy.

This is the mechanic that can fix our finances.

He’s the guy who can fix the engine of our economy.

I believe that with everything in me. If it’s between

And Romney, there isn’t a world that much difference.

The defense he makes of Romney Care could basically be a defense of Obamacare.

And I welcome you to the first of the 2012 presidential debates.

And the best course for health care is to do what we did in my state.

Last night, you saw somebody who took the stage that appeared to me to be George Washington.

MittRomney is obviously the choice of the Republican establishment.

He is not a politician.

He is a man that I would strive to be like.

Those are the folks who brought us tarp and stimulus, wars fought on credit cards, federal agents writing their own search warrants, and the federal government taking over education.

In two weeks’ time, America goes to vote for the next president in the United States.

Mitt Romney believes in all these things, but here’s the crusher.

So does President Obama.

There’s not a dime’s worth of difference.

The American people have a very, very clear choice.

Mitt Romney might as well be Barack Obama on everything from warfare to welfare.

If you want a reason to vote for Mitt Romney, here it is.

He knows what’s going on with the Federal Reserve and he is warning us.

Should the chairman of the Federal Reserve be appointed again.

You know, I think he’s doing a good job.

I think he’s doing a good job.

I am going to vote for this guy.

Look, I’m not going to spend my time going after Ben Bernanke.

I’m not going to take my, my effort and focus on the federal.

I, uh, sincerely hope that we are not at a place as Americans to where we are going to let the Democrats jam down the green new deal because because we’re at home panicked.

I want to have a frank conversation with you and ask you where you stand.

I mean, I’m in the danger zone.

I’m right at the edge.

I’m 56 in July.

They’re saying if you’re sick and you’re 60, don’t even come in. So I’m in the danger zone.

Now the German people, they got this. If If you’re handed that hat and it’s got skull and crossbones on it, don’t you look at it and go, “Um, I don’t think I thought I might be on the wrong side.”

And that just screamed, “Wrong side, wrong side.”

That was a little bit long, but I think it was really important because he is seen by so many as such a conservative or a hero for liberty to show his back and forth, his lies, his support for people that were clearly and obviously being called out at the time.

It wasn’t like, oh, nobody knew.

It was obvious.

There was lots of people calling out Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney for those things.

And then, you know, he supported Bush, he supported the bailouts, and then afterwards when it became unpopular and it was already too late, he says, “Oh, I was always against Bush and the bailouts.”

And so he’s being deceptive, and he is pushing the official narrative.

And so that way everybody’s saying, well, you know, when Beck, you know, he researches this stuff and he’s liberty-minded, he wouldn’t be backing this if there wasn’t something to it. And that’s the role that he plays.

And so it’s essential that we understand this principle of false opposition or we’re going to continue to fall for it.

So the bait and switch is that they claim to be doing something good, well of course they’re doing the complete opposite.

You have legislators, government officials, fake charities, conspirator charities, fake freedom organizations and non -governmental organizations that use this tactic of course all the time.

Often uses the problem reaction solution formula to sell on their bait and switch campaign.

So here’s a real quick short video that it shows an example that we’re seeing a lot now with housing to get out.

You have both so-called conservative or Liberty organizations pushing into 21 housing as well as the open lefty globalists doing the same thing.

Myth: Stacking more people into tighter spaces makes housing affordable.

Fact: Stacking more people into tighter places artificially inflates housing prices.

Even the Liberal Sierra Club admits high -density housing raises housing costs and the extreme high -density zoning in Hong Kong has made housing so expensive that many live in cage homes the size of dog kennels.

The affordable housing agenda is a devious scheme.

So you have so -called conservative states as well as states like New York and San Francisco pushing the same thing, wherein states like Wyoming and Utah and Idaho, their conservative legislatures are actually passing legislation forcing every city in their state to have a certain amount of high density housing.

You can see in Hong Kong, they’re actually living in kennels and they’re paying $2 ,000 a month to live in a kennel.

The post How To Recognize Political Theater appeared first on Tree of Liberty Society.

The post Kate Dalley Interviews Ben McClintock! (2025-04-07) appeared first on Tree of Liberty Society.

So as not to be fooled by these deceivers, the late John F. McManus, long-time President of the John Birch Society, gave us some key principles to understand the inner workings of the process of how the Insiders choose who the Speaker of the House of Representatives will be. Just insert the names of these past politicians with the current ones, and you will get the picture.

While the House Republicans are trying to figure out who will be their next speaker, it’s worth a look back a few decades when this extremely important post was suddenly vacated. After riding high with the 1994 GOP victories he helped engineer, and getting inordinately favorable media attention for his namby-pamby “Contract With America,” Speaker Newt Gingrich announced his retirement. His bolt-out-of-the-blue decision stunned many. But the selection by GOP House members of little-known Illinois Congressman Dennis Hastert as his successor outdid even the Gingrich departure.

Who after all was Dennis Hastert? And how did he suddenly become important enough to be named house speaker? He was a former high school teacher and wrestling coach from Yorkville, Illinois, who rose from 16 years of obscurity to win a seat in the U.S. House in 1986. Still, even after serving in the House for a decade, and becoming its speaker for another ten years, hardly anyone outside his Illinois district knew much about the man.

During his quiet years in Congress, Hastert was as middle-of-the-road as anyone could be. Toeing the establishment’s line on numerous issues, he favored Gingrich’s pro-New World Order preferences when in June 1996, he voted for foreign aid, Most Favored Nation (MFN) status for China, and expansion of NATO. Two years later, he approved more foreign aid, continuance of MFN for China, and a 12 percent increase in food stamp expenditures. Still, his votes on numerous less important matters enabled congressional scorekeepers to label him a conservative.

So how does such a person rise from near anonymity to become speaker? Asked about this somewhat amazing development, then-Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas) unhesitatingly offered that Gingrich himself had made the choice. And presto, the likeable but quiet man known among colleagues as “the coach” became speaker of the house, even serving in that post from 1999 until he chose not to stand for reelection in 2008.

Read the conclusion of this article at The New American here https://thenewamerican.com/opinion/how-the-speaker-of-the-house-is-really-chosen/?print=print

Help support ad free content with a one time donation or becoming a member today.

Thank you to our sponsors
https://connollyandsonsconcrete.com/
https://www.dentistry4health.org
http://www.highercallingfirearms.com
http://www.americanappliancehvac.com
https://insurewithcompass.com/sbarlow.html

Learn more about how the Insiders operate in our “Learn” department

The post How Speaker of the House Is Really Chosen appeared first on Tree of Liberty Society.

Get the book the powers that shouldn’t be are afraid for you to read at https://treeoflibertysociety.com/product/invasion-vol-2/

Watch the exchange below

 

Help support ad free content with a one time donation or becoming a member today.

Thank you to our sponsors
https://connollyandsonsconcrete.com/
https://www.dentistry4health.org
http://www.highercallingfirearms.com
http://www.americanappliancehvac.com
https://insurewithcompass.com/sbarlow.html

The post Election Controversy EXPLODES in Orem Utah appeared first on Tree of Liberty Society.

Henderson lays out her concern that the truth behind their fraud has gone mainstream and lists three things she wants the public to do to remain blind to their illegal activities.

PODCAST VERSION

You can watch my presentation on election fraud here:

NO ADS EVER in the video’s on our website. To help make this possible, please consider donating or becoming a member today.

Thank you sponsors
https://connollyandsonsconcrete.com/
https://www.dentistry4health.org
http://www.highercallingfirearms.com
http://www.americanappliancehvac.com
https://insurewithcompass.com/sbarlow.html

The post Election Fraud Exposed & They’re Scared! appeared first on Tree of Liberty Society.