We explore:

• The political, spiritual, and occult dimensions of the conspiracy
• How the New World Order has evolved
• The role of the Council on Foreign Relations, globalist elites, and false opposition
• Why both major political parties serve the same agenda
• The importance of education, virtue, and divine providence to defeat it.

This is one of the most important issues The New American has ever published. If you want the truth about what’s really happening in the world, this is essential viewing.

👉 Get the Special “Global Conspiracy” Issue here: https://shopjbs.org/product/tna4205/

Thank you to our sponsors
https://connollyandsonsconcrete.com/
https://www.dentistry4health.org
http://www.highercallingfirearms.com
http://www.americanappliancehvac.com
https://insurewithcompass.com/sbarlow.html

The post Dr. Bonta Reveals the Occult Truth Behind the New World Order appeared first on Tree of Liberty Society.

Only later did the truth come out: tens of millions would perish under communist rule. But by then it was too late. “China was lost in Washington, not in Peking or Shanghai,” critics said, and they were right.

It wasn’t the last time Americans would be misled. In the 1950s, the press swooned over Fidel Castro, calling him the “George Washington of Cuba.” Some knew better and sounded the alarm, but Washington repeated the same tragic pattern. Before long, Castro had Cuba in a chokehold and was exporting communist revolution across Latin America.

Why did our government keep making the same “mistakes”? Were America’s leaders simply gullible? Or was something deeper at work?

The Businessmen Who Weren’t Anti-Communist

Most Americans still hold on to a comfortable assumption: wealthy businessmen—our so-called capitalists—must be the natural enemies of communism. After all, don’t they have the most to lose under socialism? Yet reality tells a different story.

Take David Rockefeller. His Chase Manhattan Bank was the first American bank welcomed into Moscow and Peking. It financed a Soviet truck plant on the Kama River, the largest of its kind in history. Instead of fighting communism, Rockefeller was doing business with it.

This wasn’t charity. It wasn’t idealism. It was power. Some businessmen seek not freedom, but control—and communism offers the ultimate prize: political power over all.

Meet the Insiders

Who are these people? President Jimmy Carter had a name for them: the insiders. On the campaign trail in 1976, Carter promised to drive them out of Washington. Voters cheered. Yet once in office, he surrounded himself with the very men he had railed against.

Two names stood out: Cyrus Vance and Zbigniew Brzezinski. Both men were not only establishment veterans; they were pillars of two little-known organizations that have shaped U.S. policy for decades—the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission.

The Council on Foreign Relations

Headquartered in a Rockefeller-donated building on Park Avenue, the CFR has quietly dominated American political life since 1921. Its founder, Edward Mandell House, was no ordinary adviser. He was President Woodrow Wilson’s “alter ego,” a Marxist at heart who openly wrote about creating socialism in America “as dreamed of by Karl Marx.”

House plotted to control both political parties, establish a central bank, and force the United States into world government. When his League of Nations scheme faltered, he built the CFR as a vehicle for the long game.

By the 1940s, the CFR had taken over the State Department. Soon, its members were running the New York Times, CBS, NBC, Time, Newsweek—you name it. Its influence stretched into universities, foundations, labor unions, and the military. Today, it counts hundreds of U.S. officials among its ranks, though most Americans have never even heard of it. And that’s no accident: nearly two hundred journalists are CFR members themselves, and they don’t write about the organization.

At the top sits David Rockefeller.

The Trilateral Commission

If the CFR is the old guard, the Trilateral Commission is its younger partner. Conceived by Rockefeller in 1973 after reading Brzezinski’s book Between Two Ages, the Commission set out to link North America, Western Europe, and Japan. Its goal? Nothing less than world government, with “advanced communist states” eventually joining the fold.

Brzezinski himself praised Marxism as “a major advance” in human thought. He declared America “obsolete.” And yet, he became Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor.

Carter wasn’t the only insider. His administration teemed with trilateralists: Vance, Mondale, Blumenthal, Brown, Andrew Young—the list goes on. And when Carter fell, others picked up the torch. Reagan denounced the insiders on the campaign trail, but then tapped George Bush, a member of both CFR and the Trilateral Commission, as his running mate. The faces changed. The policies didn’t.

The Consequences

Look around: wars without victory, allies abandoned, communists embraced. Trade deals that send American wealth overseas. Domestic policies that inflate the dollar, bury the nation in debt, and tie down industry in red tape.

This is not drift. It is design. Rowan Gaither, president of the Ford Foundation, admitted as much in 1953 when he told a congressional investigator that he and others were working “to so alter life in the United States as to make possible a comfortable merger with the Soviet Union.”

The ultimate goal is world government. What would that mean for ordinary Americans? A forced redistribution of wealth. Regimentation in daily life. No private property, no free speech, no independent press. A socialist nightmare enforced by global power.

What Now?

The insiders count on one thing: that you will do nothing. That you’ll dismiss this as paranoia, flip the page, and get back to your routine.

But history has shown what happens when Americans are misled. China fell. Cuba fell. Vietnam fell. How many more losses can freedom endure?

The John Birch Society believes the answer is education. Tell the truth. Expose the insiders. Show Americans who really holds the levers of power. If enough people know, the insiders’ grip can be broken.

The question is whether enough will act in time.

Help us fight this Satanic conspiracy by joining the tree of Liberty Society today!

Delve deeper into the conspiracy by checking out our Secret Combinations resource page here:

https://treeoflibertysociety.com/resources/secret-combinations/ 

The post The Insiders: How Power Really Works in America appeared first on Tree of Liberty Society.

Invasion was banned by Amazon almost immediately after publication, what don’t they want you to know?

The Alfalfa Club, a highly secretive and exclusive organization, is often dismissed as an elite social gathering. However, its history and membership suggest a deeper influence. Founded under the guise of celebrating Confederate General Robert E. Lee’s birthday, the club includes high-profile politicians, business moguls, and judicial figures, such as Warren Buffett, Michael Bloomberg, John Roberts, and several former U.S. presidents. Membership is invitation-only, with new members selected upon the death of an existing one.

Despite its claimed frivolity, the club operates under strict secrecy. Media portrayals suggest it is merely a setting for elite networking and humor, yet its long-standing tradition, selective membership, and media blackout raise questions.
According to the Washington Post,

“The Alfalfa Club is more exclusive than most of Washington’s social organizations, and unlike, say, the Gridiron (which is all journalists), the members come from all sectors. Among the some 200 members, there’s a good contingent of political types (from both parties, but mostly senators; House members are kind of considered plebs in this crowd), and a heavy presence from the corporate world.

To name a few: Warren Buffett, Michael Bloomberg, Bill Marriott, Steve Case, Chief Justice John Roberts, White House senior advisor Valerie Jarrett, George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Sandra Day O’Connor, Colin Powell, Madeleine Albright and Vernon Jordan.” (What’s the Deal With The Alfalfa Club, Emily Heil, Washington Post, 29 Jan. 2015)

Most of the articles try to dismiss it as a place where elites can let their hair down, get drunk and act silly,

“Described by members as a reunion, a party a chance to enjoy a few laughs and silly speeches. ‘It is an occasion for old friends to get together and where new friends can be made,’ said incoming president Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.). ‘The evening is filled with humor — some good and some not so good.’” (The Alfalfa Club: still a place for the powerful to see and be seen, Roxanne Roberts, Washington Post, 24 Jan. 2014)

Why is this a secret society? Why limit it to 200 elites, invitation only, with a media blackout, if it is simply to celebrate a dead “racist” and be goofy?
When they are speaking to each other about themselves, what do they say? We’ve uncovered a rare autobiography about the club and have discovered that the public image is not what they think about themselves.

Now whether it’s accurate or not, this is what they believe about themselves. This autobiography was published in 1917 written by club member, H. Ralph Burton. Burton was an insider with lots of Insider connections being:

• Special Investigator for the Senate Campaign Expenditures Committee (1938-39, 1940-41)
• Special Investigator for the House Appropriations Committee in charge of NYC
and State (1939-40)
• General Counsel to the House Military Affairs Committee (1941-47)
• Chief Investigator for the Senate Committee on Post Office and Civil Service (1947-48)
• General Counsel for the House Select Committee on Current Pornographic Materials (1952-53)
• Founding Member of National Press Club
• Head of the National Union for Social Justice

In this biography, Burton reveals that,

“The Honorable John Sharp Williams, in speaking to the Alfalfa Club on January 19, 1917, stated that to his knowledge the origin of the Alfalfa Club was indicated on the Rosetta Stone, with regard to which he elaborated at length. This proved of great interest to the members, because it is a subject about which there has always been great uncertainty. It may be of interest to the entire Club that there has been brought to my attention a manuscript which would not only corroborate Senator Williams, but which has at last given to the world information with regard to this renowned organization… Now, however, there is to be presented to those persons such historical facts with regard to this, the oldest club in existence.” (The Origin, History and Object of the Alfalfa Club, Burton, 1917, pg. 3)

Their claim is to be the “oldest club in existence”!

Burton then goes on to describe the club’s origins,

“When the first known king of the human race, Menes, united the two kingdoms of Egypt under one crown, which epoch is placed by various historians from 2717 B.C. to 5867 B.C., he found it necessary to gather about him a number of real good friends, who would not mix up with the barbarians to his detriment. To this association was intrusted the great royal secrets. It was called by the king, himself, “The Alfalfa Club,” which name has remained to the present day.” (Ibid. pg. 5, non-standard spellings in the original.)

Burton then goes on to recount the power and influence of the club throughout history saying,

“Upon the founding of the City of Memphis, and the building of the great temple of Pta, the royal archives were deposited with this organization. Mesilim, King of Kish, E-Anna-Tum, Queen Nictocrosis, Asshurbanipal, King of Ninevah, Cyrus, King of Elam, and their successors, turned to this Club for pleasure, assistance, and protection. It was guardian of the royal archives. Although little known in history, it was the power behind the throne through the generations of dynasties. It was the Colonel E. M. House of the olden days.” (Ibid)

It was an open secret among the establishment that House was the “power behind the throne”, referred to as “Wilson’s [President Woodrow Wilson] brain” (The Strangest Friendship in History: Woodrow Wilson and Colonel House by George Sylvester Viereck, New York: Liveright, Inc., 1932, pg. 10) This fact is manifest in Wilson’s comment,

“I have an intimate personal matter to discuss with you… You are the only person in the world with whom I can discuss everything.” (The Intimate Papers of Colonel House, Behind the Political Curtain, Charles Seymore, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1926, Vol. 1 pg.120)

The Alfalfa Club claims to be THE power behind every major power for the last 5,000 years and that the then current war, World War I, was being fought over control of these secrets.

The Alfalfa Club is another establishment secret society whose members and leaders are consistently pushing for the anti-Christ New World Order.

From this partial compiled list of historical members, you can see the reach they have in all aspects of society:

Joseph Biden – U.S. Senator, Vice President and then President of the United States
George H.W. Bush – CIA, Skull & Bones, U.S. Vice President and then President
George W. Bush – Texas Governor, U.S. President
Dwight D. Eisenhower – U.S. President, 1953-61
Gerald Ford – U.S. President, 1974-77
Lyndon B. Johnson – U.S. President, 1963-69
Harry S. Truman – 33rd U.S. President, 1945-53
John F. Kennedy – 35th U.S. President, 1961-63
Richard M. Nixon – 37th U.S. President, 1969-74
Ronald Reagan – 40th U.S. President, 1981-89
Dick Cheney – U.S. Congressman, U.S. Vice President
Walter Mondale – U.S. Vice President under Jimmy Carter
Spiro T. Agnew – U.S. Vice President, 1969-73
Nelson Rockefeller – Ford’s Vice President
Dan Quayle – Vice President under George H.W. Bush

Members of the Tree of Liberty Society have full access to the entire Alfalfa Club biography and additional research materials. Join with us in our one of a kind struggle to restore lost liberty by clicking here today.

Watch our video reports on the Alfalfa Club in the links below:

https://treeoflibertysociety.com/the-oldest-secret-society-in-existence/

https://treeoflibertysociety.com/uncovering-the-secrets-of-the-alfalfa-club/

The post The Alfalfa Club: An Exclusive Look at America’s Hidden Power Structure appeared first on Tree of Liberty Society.

Iran is consistently presented as the “globalist boogeyman,” especially with recent events. This isn’t new. An article from 17 years ago shows Dick Cheney and George W. Bush threatening to act on Iran, with the President unwilling to leave the conflict unresolved. This agenda has been in the works for a long time. In 2004, Condoleezza Rice, another Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member, stated that “Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear arms,” warning that President Bush would use “all the tools that are available to him to stop Iran’s program”. The message is clear: Iran is not allowed to have a nuclear weapon.

This narrative continues. In 2012, Benjamin Netanyahu claimed Iran was “on the brink of a nuclear bomb in six to seven months”. Just two days ago, another article echoed this, with Netanyahu declaring an operation necessary to “roll back the Iranian threat to Israel’s very survival,” stating that Iran could produce a nuclear weapon “in a very short time” if not stopped. This “boogeyman” narrative has persisted for 20 to 30 years.

They constantly bring up arguments about Iran being a “Muslim dictatorship” that does “horrible things to women and children,” and how they “shout death to America and death to Israel,” thus justifying their inability to have a nuclear bomb. But who is promoting this narrative? Those in the Satanic Conspiracy, along with its members and associated roundtable groups such as the Council on Foreign Relations.

So, why is the conspiracy so fixated on disarming Iran, even if they never truly intend to act, perhaps using it as a distraction? We need to understand the real goal when one nation dictates another’s right to possess weapons. Ask yourself: What would happen if Iran, or Russia, or England, or Israel, or any other nation, told the United States it wasn’t allowed to have nuclear weapons anymore? We’d tell them to “pound sand,” right? This is the mindset they’re trying to instill – that certain nations aren’t allowed to defend themselves.

Who Wants War with Iran?

The Satanic globalists want war with Iran. We must understand this when we look at the news and the scare tactics used to garner support for efforts to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

War with Iran is an extension of the “Freedom from War” agenda. This is a U.S. State Department document, “Freedom from War: The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World,” State Department Document 7277, released in September 1961.

State Department Document 7277: The Disarmament Agenda

Let’s delve into State Department Document 7277. It states the goal is “to contain and reduce the nuclear threat,” meaning nations that haven’t agreed to a treaty prohibiting nuclear weaponstesting shall do so, and the “production of fissionable materials for use in weapons shall be stopped”. The ultimate goal is to ensure that all nations, without approval from the United Nations, are not allowed to produce any means of self defense.

Stage two of this program outlines “progressive control disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures of international law” to a point “where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened UN peace force”. One of the primary goals is to prevent any nation from opposing the UN army. They use Orwellian “double-speak” by calling it a “peace force,” but it’s clearly a UN army.

The final phase of the disarmament program aims for a world where “States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order,” and they would also “support and provide agreed manpower for a UN peace force”. This means nations would either not develop anything beyond what they currently have, or they would be forced to get rid of armaments, keeping only what’s necessary to quell dissension against the New World Order within our nation’s borders. If a nation “needs help”, the UN Army can be called in to stop any “rebellion”. Essentially, they want to disarm both nations and individuals to prevent opposition to the UN and to tyrants within their own borders.

Furthermore, the manufacture of armaments for a nation’s internal use would be prohibited, except for “agreed types and quantities to be used by the UN Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order”. All other armaments would be “destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes”. And like all good communists, “peace” means not opposing the New World Order.

This document, State Department Document 7277, is the current policy of both the United Nations and the United States. The conspiracy’s goal is to disarm individuals and nations, taking away their means of self-defense and their ability to declare war on anyone not in compliance.

The Principle of Self-Defense

What’s happening with Iran is a direct reflection of this. The United States, in partnership with Israel, is essentially telling Iran it has “no sovereignty” in terms of what weapons it can possess, and that they will enforce this by force and by death. The principle here, as outlined in State Department Document 7277, is that the UN will be able to disarm any nation so they can’t compete with the military, the United Nations”. This principle also applies to individuals: if the government has the right to disarm nations, then in principle, it has the right to disarm individuals. They’ve explicitly stated this.

This State Department document, 7277, is shocking and still in force. We can see its implementation with what’s happening now with Israel and Iran. This isn’t just about Israel and Iran; it applies universally. The fundamental principle is the right of self-defense. Just because I don’t like my neighbor’s church doesn’t mean I get to take away his guns.  We need to understand “the law of nations“.

The core point is the right of self-defense. You can’t just claim your neighbor is doing something you don’t like and take away their guns. “Self-defense against unjust violence is not only the right, but the duty of a nation and one of her most sacred duties”. “Self-defense being authorized by the law of nature,” it “naturally belongs to everyone and requires no permission”. (See Emer De Vattel, Law Of Nations, 1758)

We don’t need UN permission to defend ourselves if attacked, just as an individual doesn’t need to call the police for permission to defend against a robbery. It is a natural right, and anyone that tries to take it away from you is a tyrant. This applies to nations as well as individuals.

Cato’s Letters, another foundational text for the Founding Fathers, states that “the great principle of self-preservation, which is the first and fundamental law of nature calls for this procedure”. “Whatever is necessary to the public safety is just”.(Cato’s Letters 1:94) “All men have a right to defend themselves”. “There is no law that can be legitimately passed that prevents you from defending yourself”. In fact, “Whoever violates this primary law of nature ought by the law of nature to be destroyed”. (1:291-292) This principle must be applied universally: if someone says another doesn’t have the right to defend themselves, “they’re wrong and they should be destroyed”.

Joseph Smith, in an 1844 letter to his wife, Emma, said: “There is one principle which is eternal. It is the duty of all men to protect their lives and the lives of their household whenever necessity requires and no power has a right to forbid it”. This is an inherent right for both individuals and groups. He also strongly stated that “Any man who will not fight for his wife and children is a coward and a bastard,” (Words of Joseph Smith, BYU Religious Studies Center, pg. 162) emphasizing that self-defense is not just a right, but a duty for individuals and nations.

George Q. Cannon urged, “it is also for your salvation to equip yourselves now”. He suggested having weapons readily available, stating, “there is nothing that the devil is so much afraid of as a weapon of death”. This highlights that the conspiracy fears self-defense, which is why they push for gun bans and promote the lie of “peaceful resistance”. (Journal of Discourses 5:164-165)

Brigham Young similarly stated,

“By what means did [God] keep the mob from destroying us? It was by means of being well armed with the weapons of death to send them to hell cross lots. We must be so prepared that they dare not come to us in a hostile manner without being assured they will meet a vigorous resistance, and ten to one they will meet their grave. I am my own policeman, and have slept, scores of nights, with my gun and sword by my side, that is, if I slept at all. I am still a policeman. Now is the day to watch.” (Journal of Discourses 1:171-172)

Pointing out that the modern local police department is a relatively new invention, and historically, individuals were responsible for defending themselves against mobs.

The End Goal: Global Disarmament under the UN

When we support denying any nation or person the right to defend themselves, we are supporting the “satanic conspiracy’s agenda of disarmament”. The goal, as we’ve seen, is the disarmament of nations. When world leaders say a country “cannot be allowed to own nukes,” they are following this State Department document. They are either knowingly or ignorantly, but most likely knowingly, implementing the New World Order agenda of allowing only the United Nations to have weapons, except for what’s needed to quell internal rebellion.

We need to understand this because many people are acting emotionally, supporting nations like Israel, even when they’re “claiming to be Israel when it’s not”. They say we must “stop these bad guys” because “they have a religion that I really don’t like” or “they’re doing things that I really don’t like”. While Iran may “shout death to America,” if they attack us, we have the right to defend ourselves, and they have every right to defend themselves if attacked. I will protect everyone’s right to defend themselves.

Enslavement and disarmament go hand in hand; ultimately, the goal is to disarm to enslave. Any church that advocates for disarmament is essentially advocating the enslavement of mankind. The arguments often heard on conservative media about Israel and Iran are problematic. They suggest killing people based on their “thoughts” or what they “say they want”. It doesn’t matter how bad the thought is; “nobody should be killed or murdered for their thoughts”. When Iranian comments about wiping Israel off the map are taken in context, they often mean that Israel is an “illegitimate nation” due to its foundations and “war crimes,” not a desire for a new Holocaust. While some may sincerely want that, it is “no grounds to murder somebody”.

The Wisdom of the Founding Fathers: Mind Our Own Business

What was the Founding Fathers’ position on engaging with other nations? It’s encapsulated in John Quincy Adams’ words: “America goes not abroad in search for monsters to destroy”. She is a “well-wisher to the freedom and independence,” but “she is the champion and vindicator only of her own”. We don’t vindicate or champion anyone else’s cause. America “will recommend the general cause by the countenance of her voice and the benign sympathy of her example”.

Adams warned that “by once enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence,” America “would involve herself beyond the power of extrication in all the wars of interest and entry of individual avarice, envy, and ambition”. The “fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly change from liberty to force”. No matter the argument for intervention, the natural result is force. (John Quincy Adams, 4 July 1821)

This is precisely what we’re seeing: the implementation of the United Nations program to disarm the world, allowing only the UN to control global weapons, thus preventing resistance to their tyranny. It’s crucial to understand these principles, not just for current events, but to be aware and beware of the lies promoted by so-called conservatives promoting the globalist agenda. Anyone advocating to “stop Iran from having nuclear weapons” is part of the New World Order, or at least promoting their agenda. They expose themselves as a mouthpiece of the conspiracy and should not be taken seriously.

The post The Surrender of Sovereignty: What ‘Iran Can’t Have Nukes’ Really Means appeared first on Tree of Liberty Society.