It’s Time To Expose The Conspiracy

Originally written by Alan Stang in 1980

The Council on Foreign Relations (C.F.R.) and its affiliated body, the Trilateral Commission, have faced significant criticism. Numerous organizations and media outlets have played a pivotal role in unveiling the activities of these secretive entities. For many years, the C.F.R.-Trilateral conspirators adhered to a strategy of complete silence. During the 1970s, when investigative journalists began to shed light on their operations, the conspirators chose not to respond. This decision was undoubtedly prudent, given the immense influence wielded by these international figures, whose impact on the collective efforts of American advocates was likely negligible, akin to a flea’s effect on a brontosaurus. However, the prolonged political battles of the 1980s served as a turning point. The long-standing wall of silence, which had seemed unassailable, finally crumbled. The truth, once restricted to a select few, surged forth into the public domain. Ordinary citizens—facing unemployment, bankruptcy, and the repercussions of deliberate policies enacted by these Establishment insiders—began to demand answers and engage in discussions about the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. Consequently, the conspirators shifted to a new strategy.
David Rockefeller

David Rockefeller, former head of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission, expressed  to the Los Angeles World Affairs Council that he is largely unfazed by the petty and narrow-minded criticisms from extremists. If this assertion holds true, it is akin to a pig being indifferent to its fate as pork chops.  Rockefeller and his elite associates found themselves in a position of having to defend their actions. In August 1980, during the National Convention in Boston, the American Legion passed Resolution 773, which condemned the Carter Administration for placing the United States in a situation where allies began to doubt its resolve and commitment, as well as for its strong advocacy of relinquishing control of the Panama Canal.

 It condemned Jimmy Carter, who “in strong support of the SALT treaty appointed Trilateralist Paul Warnke to be our chief negotiator of a second SALT treaty which would perpetuate the military superiority of the Soviets.” The Legionnaires declared the Carter Administration to be “dominated by a disproportionate number of elitist members of the Council on Foreign Relations and its offspring,   the Trilateral Commission,” and reported that those outfits “have espoused and promulgated domestic   and foreign policies which are judged to be inimical to America’s best interests.”
In Boston, at its National Convention, the American Legion resolved its demand “in the best interests of our country that the Congress of the United States launch a comprehensive investigation into the Trilateral Commission and its parent organization, the Council on Foreign Relations, to determine what influence has been and is being exerted over the foreign and domestic policies of the United States.”
Even many readers of this website didn’t know about Resolution 773 until now. Many Americans still don’t know about it. We know the network news reporters were aware of it because they and their cameras were at the Convention to cover speeches by the Presidential candidates. But the Lords of Teleprompter didn’t tell you about any of this. It “wasn’t news.” Why not? Could the blackout have anything to do with the facts that William Paley and Frank Stanton, of CBS, belong to the Council on Foreign Relations; that John Chancellor and David Brinkley, of NBC, belong; that Margaret Osmer, formerly of ABC and “Good Morning America,” is now Director of Programs for the C.F.R.? Could the blackout have anything to do with the fact that Hedley Donovan, former editor-in-chief of Time, then a top White House assistant to Jimmy Carter, is a member of both the Trilateral Commission and the C.F.R.; that double-header Cyrus Vance is a director of the New York Times; that Trilateralist J. Paul Austin, of Coca-Cola, is a director of Dow Jones, which publishes the Wall Street Journal? These are just a few of many examples. If these people were to answer the American Legion’s questions, they would be incriminating themselves.
Indeed, the crucial question arises as to which Congressmen would conduct the investigation the American Legion wants. Congressmen who belong, or have belonged, to either the Trilateral Commission or the Council on Foreign Relations, or both, include double-header John Anderson, a Republican; double-header John Brademas, a Democrat; Barber Conable, a Republican; Tom Foley, a Democrat — along with Senators Lawton Chiles, Alan Cranston, John Culver, John Danforth, William Roth, and William Cohen; half of whom are Republicans, the rest Democrats. Senator George McGovern, the best legislator the Vietcong ever had, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. So was Senator Frank Church, until too many Idaho potato farmers began to ask him about it.
So the Conspiracy used Plan A on Resolution 773. This will end as the American Legion’s blockbuster percolates through the national consciousness; at which point David Rockefeller, who “isn’t bothered,” will be bothered even more. Ordinarily, the conspirators would now go to Plan B, under which the only moderate opinion is that expressed by the Trilateral Commission itself, and anyone who complains about it is “extreme.”

But Plan B won’t work on the American Legion. It would backfire in a big way. For years the “Liberal” press has labored to condition the people to think of any American group that dares to speak out against political conspiracy as “extreme.” But everybody knows the American Legion is not extreme. The American Legion is moderate to the point of fanaticism. Its members are not lonely Jeremiahs shouting jeremiads to the wind. They are real people! Your father belongs to the American Legion. So do your brother and husband. My own father was one of the Legion’s first members, and, if memory serves, was a Legionnaire for about fifty years.

All of which adds up to delightful trouble for the Conspiracy. Presumably it will have to go to Plan C, whatever that is. So let’s hear it for the American Legion! Meanwhile, let’s stake out some of the territory a proper congressional investigation of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission should cover.
Woodrow Wilson

Peacemongers For War

War is certainly a subject of special interest to Legionnaires. As we have seen, the C.F.R.-Trilats belong to both major parties, and they alternately trumpet and bray that they are righteously for peace. They claim that most of what they do is designed to maintain peace. “He Kept Us Out Of War,” said Woodrow Wilson of himself in 1916. “I hate war, Eleanor hates war,” and, of course, Fala hates war, said F.D.R. So Legionnaires may want to know why America is so rarely at peace.
The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace has long been an instrumentality of the Establishment Insiders. It is closely related to both the C.F.R. and the Trilateral Commission. Indeed, Soviet spy Alger Hiss, founding secretary-general of the United Nations, used to be president of the Endowment, and was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. All of this was before he was sent to the penitentiary. Trilateralist Hedley Donovan, of the C.F.R., who used Time magazine to help create Jimmy Carter, is a director of the Carnegie Endowment.  It is fair to say in general that the same people run all three of these organizations.

Norman Dodd, director of research for the Reece Committee, whose investigation of the tax-exempt foundations was sandbagged by Congressman Wayne Hays, told your reporter that he once sent a lady lawyer to New York to read the minutes of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. When she went to New York she was dubious about the existence of a conspiracy within the American Establishment. She returned in such a state of shock that her life was permanently changed. In the minutes of Endowment meetings conducted several years before World War I, she found discussions of a scheme to establish “world peace” by means of a world war which would lead to World Government.

Winston Churchill

And the conspirators did everything they could to implement this plan. For instance, with the connivance of Woodrow Wilson and Robert Lansing, later Secretary of State, Winston Churchill and other figures in England conspired to get the Lusitania sunk in order to inflame American opinion and stampede the United States into the World War. The Lusitania was a military vessel, commissioned by the Royal Navy. It was sunk not by German torpedoes, but by the massive, internal explosion of millions of rounds of ammunition, secretly put aboard in New York with the connivance of American authorities. By means of newspaper ads, the German government tried to warn prospective passengers to stay off the ship, since it was an armed auxiliary cruiser of the Royal Navy taking munitions and troops to England. The conspirators did their best to squelch those ads, for they wanted the killing of American citizens in order to provide a casus belli. Winston Churchill, then First Lord of the Admiralty, had commissioned a study of what would happen if a “passenger ship” were sunk by Germans with Americans aboard. And so rancid was the operation that, even after the sinking of the Lusitania, the conspirators needed almost another two years to maneuver us into the war. You can read about the crime in Colin Simpson’s book The Lusitania (Boston, Little Brown, 1972). As Lord Mersey, head of the British inquiry, later remarked: It was “a damned dirty business.”

Of course, there wasn’t the slightest reason for the United States to want to enter World War I. There was no reason on earth for Washington to conspire to get us into that war. The American people didn’t want it, and even if they had there was genuine confusion about whom to fight against. Today it is generally forgotten that the British, like the Germans, were interfering with our shipping; and the British were considerably worse. They were also considerably less humane. The Germans sank merchantmen, but allowed the crews to row away alive. The British machine-gunned crews in the water.
So there was substantial opinion in America which said we should go to war against England! In fact England was our historic enemy, while we had never fought Germany. The only reason we did so now was that Edward House, Woodrow Wilson’s Edgar Bergen, was an agent of the British Rothschilds and co-conspirator Andrew Carnegie was a British citizen determined to make billions from his U.S. steel holdings. In 1916, while asking the American people for re-election because, “He Kept Us Out Of War,” House and Wilson were plotting to put us into the war. Edward House was a Marxist. We know he was a Marxist because he said he was, in his anonymous 1912 book entitled Philip Dru: Administrator in, which he wrote that he was working for what he called “Socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx.”
They wanted war, once again, in  order to use it as a lever to maneuver us into World Government under their own control. But, of course,  they failed. The rudimentary World  Government was known at the time as the League of Nations, and the  conspirators failed to trick us into it because they had failed to prepare  sufficiently what Nicholas Murray Butler called “The American Mind.” It was precisely for this reason that they formed the Council on Foreign Relations. Its purpose from the very beginning was to bury the American Mind in propaganda about the wonders of World Government, so that the next time the conspirators had the chance to maneuver us into such a net they would succeed.
John Foster Dulles

Among the founders of the C.F.R. were Marxist Edward House, a Democrat; John Foster Dulles, later Secretary of State, and his brother, Allen Welsh Dulles, later boss of the C.I.A., both Republicans. As we have seen, the political parties mean nothing to these operators.

The same conspiratorial machinations preceded American entry into World War II. By that time, members of the Council on Foreign Relations effectively controlled the U.S. Department of State. In the C.F.R. house organ, known as Foreign Affairs, John Lewis Gaddis reported in January 1974: “…Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor actually thrust the United States into World War II, but the Roosevelt administration had decided a year and a half earlier to risk war in order to prevent the totalitarian domination of all Europe.”
Here is a flat admission that F.D.R.’s public stance of neutrality during this period was a fraud. In the re-election year of 1940, in a replay of the travesty of 1916, Roosevelt solemnly promised the American people “again, and again, and again,” that he would never send their sons to fight in a foreign war. He simply lied. Even as he made that speech, he was plotting like Woodrow Wilson — with the same Winston Churchill — to get us into the war at the side of England. He finally did so by means of the disaster at Pearl Harbor, which was literally a setup. The attack on Pearl Harbor was designed to be a World War II version of the sinking of the Lusitania, and it worked. Later investigation revealed that Washington knew that the attack was coming in plenty of time to warn our Pearl Harbor commanders. Washington knew this because we had broken the Japanese Purple Code with the so-called “magic machine.”
Pearl didn’t know it, because Washington denied it a machine. Instead, Washington installed one in London, for Churchill. That’s right! Washington denied our own commanders vital information that was going to another nation.
On the desk of Army Chief of Staff George Marshall in Washington was a special telephone with which he could have talked to our Pearl Harbor commanders in seconds. How would you guess he warned them of the impending attack? Answer: By commercial telegram. DEAR GENERAL SHORT, DEAR ADMIRAL KIMMEL, YOU WILL BE ATTACKED. STOP. That, in essence, was what the telegram said, and by the time it arrived it was redundant. The attack was taking place. Legionnaires will want to remember that the men aboard the sunken Arizona are still there.

By the end of the war, the Council on Foreign Relations had been assaulting “The American Mind” with the wonders of World Government for almost twenty-five years. At the San Francisco Conference, in 1945, more than forty members of the American delegation sent to establish the United Nations belonged to the C.F.R. Among them was John Foster Dulles, a C.F.R. founder. In fact, the Conference was a C.F.R. show. The Acting Secretary-General who ran it was Alger Hiss, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and a top State Department official, who even signed the credentials the delegates needed to get into the hall.  Hiss was a secret Communist.

Trygve Lie
In 1946, at the first London Conference, the U.S. delegation agreed that the Soviets would always run U.N. military activities, and that the Americans would always run U.N. financial activities. In short, the Soviets won the right to run the U.N., and the Americans won the right to pay for it. So it has been from the very beginning. In his autobiography, In The Cause Of Peace, Trygve Lie, Hiss’s successor as Secretary-General, wondered aloud why the Americans would agree to such an incredible arrangement. Lie presumably was not in on the con. The answer to his question is that the American delegation which agreed to the deal was headed by C.F.R. founder John Foster Dulles and by Soviet agent Alger Hiss. Legionnaires who dare to call all this a Conspiracy will get no argument from your reporter.

Indeed, Legionnaires will be interested in a C.F.R. series called American Interests In The War And The Peace, consisting of confidential memoranda prepared for the State Department in 1944. “…The sovereignty fetish is still so strong in the public mind, that there would appear to be little chance of winning popular assent to American membership in anything approaching a super-state organization. Much will depend on the kind of approach which is used in further popular education…” Yes, that is what the Council on Foreign Relations says!

Remember that at this very moment, in 1944, future members of the American Legion were fighting overseas to protect that sovereignty — or so they had been told — but the C.F.R. which inherited their victory calls it a “fetish.” The Council wants to replace the “fetish” with a “superstate organization.” This would boil down to the abolition of our country, which would be turned from an independent nation into a shape on the map. How was all this to be accomplished? Answer: By transferring control of our military from the American people to the C.F.R.’s “super-state organization.” Without our having that control, in effect, our country would cease to exist.
Now, Legionnaires, hear this! The same Council on Foreign Relations study explains that “a possible further difficulty was cited, namely that [difficulty] arising from the Constitutional provision that only Congress may declare war. This argument was countered with the contention that a treaty would override this barrier, let alone the fact that our participation in such police action as might be recommended by the international security organization need not necessarily be construed as war.”

Remember that this confidential document was prepared for the State Department by the Council itself. Notice that the C.F.R. is recommending ways to circumvent our Constitution. From now on, says the Conspiracy, wars will not be declared by the people through their Congressmen, as the Constitution specifies. The implication of the fact that the people can declare, or not declare, war is that the United States Government still exists. And the conspirators want to destroy the United States Government. So the C.F.R. study shows that their plan was to trick us into war under the control of their “super-state organization” simply by calling the war something else.

The phrase the Council suggested was “police action.” The Constitution says Congress declares war. Congress does not declare police action. Remember that the date of this C.F.R. study was 1944. Only six years later, in 1950, the United States found itself in the third of the major wars the Conspiracy has tricked us into so far in this century. Those of you American Legionnaires who fought and bled in Korea probably thought you were in a war. But you weren’t. You were in a police action. Remember? The Korean “police action” was the perfect implementation of the C.F.R.’s plan. Remember that there was no Declaration of War. The President did not ask you for one through your representatives in Congress. To ask your permission in this way implies that you are sovereign and supreme. Instead, the President instituted government by dictatorship. One man put you into war. This means that the War in Korea was illegal. The President committed an impeachable crime. Remember that this was the work of the peace-loving “Liberals” of the C.F.R.
Specifically, how did we get into the Korean War? John Gaddis says this in the C.F.R.’s journal: “…The Administration assumed from the first that the Russians had sanctioned the attack, a conclusion which recent, though admittedly tendentious, evidence from Soviet sources tends to support…” This is a polite way of confirming that evidence of Soviet direction of the War in Korea — from before the beginning — is overwhelming. For instance, the New York Times of June 17, 1956, says Soviet dictator Khrushchev has admitted that Stalin “ordered North Korea to attack South Korea. New evidence now available supports these rumors…” That is  but one of many examples.  But now, Legionnaires, remember  the official story of our entry into the war. You were told that the Soviets had finally “blundered.” Their “blunder” consisted of boycotting the Security Council, to protest America’s refusal to admit Communist China to membership. If the  Soviet delegate had been present, he  could have vetoed our entry into the war. He wasn’t and didn’t. The Soviets “goofed.” America won a smashing victory: the right to send our military half way around the world to fight a land war in Asia under the control of the United Nations. But, as we have seen, the Soviets started the war themselves. This means that they knew when it would start. If they had wanted to keep us out, Stalin would have told his U.N. delegate, Jacob Malik, to forget the boycott, to take his seat at the Security Council, and vote nyet. The fact that the Soviets didn’t do this is proof not just that they didn’t want to keep us out of the Korean War — but that they wanted to trick us in. Along these lines, John Lewis  Gaddis tells us this in the C.F.R. journal Foreign Affairs: “…By the end of 1950 the Administration had reason to conclude that objective appraisals of the international situation  only led to confusion; oversimplifi cation, even occasional deception, might be required to persuade the  American people and their allies to do what was necessary to ensure their own security…” Yes, that’s what the man says, in the C.F.R.’s own  magazine. It means that the Council’s leaders lied to the American people. It doesn’t take much daring to call this a Conspiracy. Legionnaires will also remember that the Korean War was the first the United States couldn’t win. Why not? Only five years earlier we had beaten Germany, Japan, and Italy — the most advanced countries in the world — all at the same time. Why couldn’t we beat relatively tiny North Korea, and relatively primitive Red China? The answer is that the people we were fighting controlled our side of the war. As we have seen, Soviet agent Hiss and C.F.R. conspirator Dulles agreed at the first London conference that a Communist would always run U.N. military activities. The Communist who ran U.N. military activities during the Korean War was Undersecretary for Political and Security Council Affairs Konstantin E. Zinchenko, a Soviet employee. Zinchenko was General MacArthur’s boss. It was to him that United Nations Commander MacArthur was supposed to report. In his autobiography, MacArthur describes how General Walton Walker complained bitterly that the Communists knew his plans before he could put them to use. The problem was that the Reds were not only running their side through Mao Tse-tung; they were also running our side through Konstantin E. Zinchenko. When MacArthur acted independently to bypass his U.N. superiors, President Truman recalled MacArthur. And so Legionnaires who heroically fought and bled and died in Korea were made the victims of a hideous charade, a fraud, a monstrous treason. The traitors did the same thing  again in Vietnam. How many times must this happen before we get the point? Again we entered the war under the auspices of the United Nations, through our membership in the South East Asian Treaty Organization, a U.N. subsidiary. Again we couldn’t win it because our own C.F.R. leaders wouldn’t let us. Indeed, while Legionnaires again were dying and being maimed, Washington’s policy of “business as usual” sent crucial military supplies to the Communist satellites in Eastern Europe; which, in turn, provided the Vietcong with almost all of their military equipment. Among the things the C.F.R. traitors sent were computers, airborne navigational radar, rifle-cleaning compounds, rubber, petroleum, and so on. American-designed computers guiding Soviet missiles shot down our planes. In World War II, we would have called this treason. What do you Legionnaires call it now?
We entered the Vietnam War under C.F.R. member John F. Kennedy. Another C.F.R. member, Richard Nixon, denounced the Democrats in 1968 for permitting military supplies to go to the European arsenal of the Vietcong. Elect me, said Republican Nixon, and I will change this suicidal policy dramatically. The people elected him, and C.F.R. member Nixon did as he promised. He changed the Democrat policy dramatically. Nixon expanded this treasonous aid to the enemy. Under Nixon, the Communists got more help from our C.F.R. businessmen than ever before.
Council on Foreign Relations Logo

Trilateralism Today

The comprehensive congressional investigation demanded by the American Legion should certainly include the prelude to the recent Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The heavy military trucks and tank engines that the Soviets are using to destroy Afghanistan were made in the Kama River truck factory. This is the largest factory of its kind in the world, designed to produce more heavy trucks than all U.S. companies put together. Forty-five percent of Kama’s financing came from the Export-Import Bank — a federal agency — which means you. Another forty-five percent came from the Chase Manhattan Bank — which means top Trilateralist David Rockefeller.

That’s right! The Soviets only put up ten percent to finance their own factory. The invasion of Afghanistan was made here — in the United States. You Legionnaires made it! You didn’t know it, but the federal government, controlled for many years by the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission, used your tax money to finance that plant. It is interesting to note that in his speech to the Los Angeles World Affairs Council, in the spring of 1980, David Rockefeller said this: “To some extremists, the Trilateral Commission is pictured as a nefarious plot by an Eastern Establishment of businessmen in the service of multinational corporations, who will do almost anything including going into cahoots with the Kremlin for the sake of financial gain…” At this point, everybody is presumably supposed to erupt into belly-popping laughter at whatever poor, sick clods could possibly believe anything so ridiculous. But, as we have seen, the relationship Rockefeller tries to ridicule exists exactly as he says. And the Kama River truck factory is unfortunately just one of many examples that we could cite.

In fact, in 1980, after Afghanistan, the Commerce Department approved the shipment to Communist-occupied Russia of automated assembly-line equipment that will double the capacity of the Kama River plant. Presumably this means that the Soviets will be able to produce twice as many heavy trucks for use in future invasions. Remember that this is happening after charter Trilateral member Jimmy Carter said his eyes were finally opened.

William J. Casey With Ronald Reagan

It is also important to remember that the president of the Export-Import Bank, whose job it was to arrange forty-five percent of the financing for Kama, was C.F.R. member William J. Casey, who got the job on the recommendation of his friend, Henry Kissinger — and who recently turned up as the campaign manager for Ronald Reagan.

Some Legionnaires are reluctant to subscribe to “the Conspiracy theory,” because the Rockefellers and the Reds “can’t possibly have anything in common.” So let’s go now to friendly Warsaw, where visiting Trilateralist Jimmy Carter said as follows in 1977: “Our concept of human rights is preserved in Poland.” Jimmy also explained that there is “a substantial degree of freedom of religion” in that Communist dictatorship. But as we saw recently the workers didn’t agree.
It now turns out that Poland owes even more money to Western banks than originally feared. Poland owes about twenty billion dollars, and is having trouble paying. In order to service its debt, Warsaw has to pay ninety-two percent of its export income, a dramatically high proportion. The Western banks have been worried about default. Correspondent Clyde Farnsworth notes in the New York Times: “Because of the spectacular expansion of lending to Poland and other Communist countries in the last decade, both the Communist authorities and the capitalist bankers recognize a convergence of interest in stability — so much so that one Western banker who asked not to be cited by name said that if the Russians actually did intervene in Poland, the nation’s creditworthiness might actually increase.” Yes, that is what the man says!
In short, it is in the interest of these Western bankers to continue Communist dictatorship in Poland, because that is the best way for them to get back the money they have lent and then some. Farnsworth also talked with Doctor Penelope Hartland-Thunberg, director of research at the Georgetown Center for Strategic and International Studies: “She suggests that it could have been pressure from the Western banks in the latest credit negotiations that led to the Polish decision to increase meat prices, which in turn triggered the strikes.”
Let’s see, it was the strikes that raised the threat of Soviet intervention in Poland, which, as we have seen, these huge Western banks would like. Question: Did the banks deliberately precipitate the turmoil in order to provide an excuse for their Soviet friends to invade? The question may make your hair stand straight up; but, as we have seen, it is a reasonable question. Remember that, according to the New York Times, the interests of these bankers and the Communists coincide. That does seem to eliminate the biggest obstacle to “the Conspiracy theory,” doesn’t it?

Meanwhile, the banks are lending Poland still more money. A West German syndicate has come through with $667 million. A fifteen-bank syndicate led by the Bank of America is lending $325 million. This means that these banks will be more interested than ever in maintaining Communist dictatorship in Poland.

Bank of America

Boss man at Bank of America is A.W. Clausen, who says this: “The expansion of our consciousness to the global level offers mankind perhaps the last real chance to build a world order less coercive than that offered by the nation-state.” This of course is standard Trilateral claptrap, which should not surprise members of the American Legion, because Clausen has been a member of the Trilateral Commission. Notice that he wants to destroy the nation-state. The United States is a nation-state, which means that he wants to destroy our national sovereignty. Doesn’t this mean that Clausen is a subversive? In this case, a subversive is someone who works slyly to tear down our great system of limited, constitutional government, national independence, and Free Enterprise – and A.W. Clausen perfectly fits the bill. Legionnaires will please note that by no means are all subversives starving and oppressed.

In place of our government, Clausen wants to put World Government, run by himself and his friends. In fact Jimmy Carter just named him to succeed Robert McNamara as head of the World Bank.

And remember that Clausen’s Trilateral Bank of America, like boss Trilateralist David Rockefeller’s Chase Manhattan, is vigorously doing “business as usual” in Red China. A while back, conspirator Clausen was in Peiping. There, says Professor Antony Sutton, in the April 1979 issue of The Trilateral Observer, the Communists gave the Bank of America boss royal treatment, including a chauffeured car. The Reds invited the Bank to establish an office in Peiping. Clausen and the Reds discussed a Bank of America loan of one billion dollars. Clausen says that Communist-occupied China is “eminently creditworthy.” Doubtless the World Bank will be pouring in more billions.

Remember that the Reds to whom Clausen is lending this money are the same ghouls who have murdered more than sixty-four million of their fellow Chinese. Like the Soviets, they are financing terror and subversion around the world. They sponsored the Pol Pot regime in Cambodia, which killed about half the population of that country. In the United States, such a regime would kill a hundred million people. Indeed, Legionnaires will especially want to remember that Clausen’s Red Chinese tortured our Prisoners Of War in Korea, and kept hundreds of them after Operation Big Switch. Some of those Americans may still be alive in  Red China, while A.W. Clausen eats chicken chow mein in Peiping.
What has the Trilateral Commission done to us? In the Freemen Digest’s study of Trilateralism, economist Jeremiah Novak says this: “In October 1979, the U.S. appealed to  the I.M.F. to rescue the dollar. Under the projected rescue program, the I.M.F. would use its currency, the SDR, or special drawing rights, to buy up excess dollars on the world market. The I.M.F. then would buy U.S. Treasury notes and bills with the dollars. As these debts were repaid, the I.M.F. would add the payments to its assets. The problem with this program is that the I.M.F. would then have the same power over the U.S. as it does over most other nations. The difference is that the U.S. no longer controls the I.M.F., for Europe and Japan have as much power as does the U.S., and their power is increasing. The I.M.F. will be able, therefore, to dictate to the U.S…”
Harry Dexter White
The man who supervised creation of the International Monetary Fund at the close of World War II, was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Harry Dexter White, who later was exposed as a Soviet spy.

In August of 1979, Undersecretary of the Treasury Anthony Solomon — another Trilateralist — said in Austria that the United States must face being “prepared to contemplate openly a partial ceding of national sovereignty and authority over economic policy to an international body such as the I.M.F.” But at Chateau Thierry, Belleau Wood, Bastogne, Midway, Iwo Jima, Pork Chop Hill, Inchon, the Vietnamese highlands, and on a thousand other battlefields, members of the American Legion died to preserve that national independence.

Let’s all get behind the American Legion’s demand for a congressional investigation of the role of the Trilateral Commission and the C.F.R. in controlling American foreign policy. It is time formally to expose the Conspiracy

Share:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Take Action

Tree of Liberty Society is working from the national to the local level to educate citizens on the principles of liberty and expose those conspiring to take away your freedom. It’s time for you to become a part of a community taking action.

Join Our Email List

Receive notifications about new posts, events, and more.

Recent Posts

Get your FREE exposé of the international conspiracy!