Member training from May 5th 2025.
This presentation, Evolution and the Conspiracy Part 2, In this discussion, Micah challenges the mainstream narrative of evolution, highlighting how natural selection operates as a conservative process that eliminates genetic information rather than creating new traits. He explores the distinction between microevolution and macroevolution, demonstrating that genetic mutations never introduce new information but merely duplicate or remove existing genetic material. Using examples from agriculture, hybrid animals, and historical atmospheric conditions, Micah illustrates how environmental factors influence organism behavior without fundamentally altering genetic structures. From pre-flood longevity to modern-day species limitations, Micah argues that adaptation is not evolution but rather the amplification or suppression of existing traits. Ultimately, Micah emphasizes that lifeforms only reproduce after their own kind and that the scientific establishment has repeatedly misled the public through faulty claims, selective interpretation, and outright deception. This is a call to critically examine foundational assumptions and reclaim a perspective grounded in observable reality.
Help support ad free content with a one time donation or becoming a member today.
Thank you to our sponsors
https://connollyandsonsconcrete.com/
https://www.dentistry4health.org
http://www.highercallingfirearms.com
http://www.americanappliancehvac.com
https://insurewithcompass.com/sbarlow.html
TRANSCRIPT
Dear Heavenly father, we’re grateful for this day that we have to meet together with
our friends of our society and the Liberty Tree Society,
meeting together under thy spirit and love of liberty, helping us to all form new
fervor for Living the righteous principles of liberty and helping us to all learn
together what those are and how to best practice them and As we navigate today’s
world and we say to bless those that Contribute to the lesson tonight that they
will Share what’s on their heart what they’ve prepared and help us all to receive
it and like mindedness and we say things
Okay, so our last section was on the beginning of evolution cosmic evolution even
though that’s not where the the study and air quotations of evolution started.
It really started. Hey, Mike, I’m sorry real quick. If you want to click on the
three dots on more, so they’ll get rid of that window.
But I’m loading meeting controls. Okay, fantastic
I’ve just dragged it over to the other my other screen. Oh, well, whatever. You can
do that. Yes
I’m
in order to zoom saying what okay, I can’t even see zoom now. Okay, whatever. Don’t
matter. okay so we start with cosmic evolution the evolution of life is actually the
first part of the study the religion of evolution and so we’re gonna now we’re
going to start on that section just a little refresher in the beginning there was
nothing and then all that nothing was crammed into a black hole and then all that
nothing somehow exploded because reasons and created the whole universe and and then
the universe started expanding an accelerated rate from where it had violated all
laws of nature and at some point in time the earth was a hot ball of gooey mess
it turned into a rock after it cool down. For whatever reason,
there was a bunch of rain. It made primordial soup.
And then we have our single celled organism from that soup. Meow, meow, blah, blah,
blah. And you know, there’s where old Charlie begins this thing.
And so single -celled organism, makes a fish, fish grows legs, becomes all kinds of
creatures, eventually becomes man. So the, there are three types that the
evolutionists claim for the evolution of life. The third one is pretty lame.
I’m not even going to talk, it’s basically semantics. So the main the main two
though are there’s micro evolution which is small genetic changes over a short period
of time
and then the second type is macro evolution which is a change of one creature into
another type of creature and so they claim that micro evolution with all these small
genetic changes eventually forms a new creature. So microevolution develops into
macroevolution. Now I completely disagree with with these definitions that they they
put forward. I would like to call this anti -evolution because the small genetic
changes over a short period of time, which are definitely definitely can be shown
unimproven, but they’re actually just a loss of genetic information by natural
selection. So that the process of natural selection, it only eliminates genes from
the gene pool. It doesn’t make any new genes. And so that means that macroevolution
is just fiction.
So let me explain. So microevolution is a conservative process. So it it doesn’t
that means it can’t create anything so it only eliminates it only removes genes from
the gene pool
and so and the more it happens the less diversity there is and so for example
let’s say you had five elephants one of them was red and the other four were blue
and the blue ones didn’t have any you know like like dormant or submissive genes,
red genes, sitting inside them, like they had that, nothing red. And the red,
the red elephant, it dies before it’s able to procreate.
So what you have there is you have now from the, from the existing DNA for
elephants, there is no longer the red elephant gene, it just, it doesn’t exist. it’s
completely gone.
So another example you could look at for microevolution would be if you had a
couple of wolves you could keep breeding them eventually until they became a very
smug Chihuahua. But if you had a very pure smug Chihuahua and you bred it with
another pure smug Chihuahua You would never get a wolf So because that particular
the Chihuahua gene pool doesn’t have all the data in it left to make a Wolf if
they were like pure they purely had all that stuff gone They didn’t have any
submissive or dormant genes for wolf stuff.
So now there are some laws for procreation. And there are five of them that,
through my observations, I have labeled them. I don’t really want to say I’ve
discovered them because other people have done so much leg work. I just kind of put
names to them and definitions. So genetic information can only be duplicated or lost.
New information is never created. Okay, which we kind of went over a little bit.
So they call, it’s called a mutation. Genetic mutations, they do happen,
but they are, well, there’s some problems with them, first being that they’re never
new information. So for example, so we got a cow, and it’s got an extra leg coming
off its neck. That’s pretty weird. And So that’s a genetic mutation. I mean that
that happened that that’s real as far as I know. This is a real photo But that
leg it already has four legs. It already has a hoof. It just some there was some
kind of accident that happened and
An extra one grew on its neck So and I would say That this mutation is actually a
problem because it’s some extra appendage for some predator to grab. It doesn’t
really do the cow any good. Here’s another one. Here’s a shark with one eyeball.
I have no idea if this image is real. I mean, I don’t have any reason to believe
it’s fake, but maybe it is. It’s an example of mutation I found out there.
But yet again, it already had eyeballs, but now it has one, and it’s in the wrong
place. So there’s a mutation, but there’s no new genetic information. So here’s a
duck and it accidentally grew an extra set of lakes. So same thing,
just duplicate information. It’s a mutation. This one, so this is a fly.
So the regular fly is on the top left there and the mutated mutated flies on the
bottom right. This one is actually it’s University, I think in Chicago. I don’t
remember where it is. Somewhere in the Midwest. And so they spent a hundred years,
this experiment’s been going on for a hundred years, where they have selectively bred
these flies to have extra wings.
But this is really problematic though, because it already had the information to make
extra wings. And it’s even more problematic because those wings actually don’t have
muscles to do anything. And so this fly cannot even perform its namesake.
It can’t fly. The extra wings throw it off balance. And they actually force breed
the proper mates with these with these double -winged flies to keep them alive.
Yeah, it’s been going on since like the ’20s. Here’s another one, the double -horned
goat. So this one actually does show up in nature every once in a while. It’s
pretty rare, but there’s actually people that selectively breed goats to get the
double horns.
And this would be an example of a mutation that already had the data and make a
horn it’s just in a new place but it doesn’t it doesn’t seem to be a radical
deficit to them but it’s not new it’s just the same information copied
but these horns they can they can kill the goats or the sheep because the horns
can grow into themselves and hurt themselves so it is a thing but you know we’ve
got the shark with the one eyeball it’s pretty easy to get scratched out you know
it’s on the front the regular shark can roll its eyes back in its head and its
eyes are on the side away from its mouth so it’s less likely to go blind the cow
can you know it’s got something else or something to grab on to it the duck can’t
walk the fly can’t fly and the the sheep is is The horns aren’t really doing much
good and it can actually kill itself by the horns growing into its jaw and head
and everything
So never ending so now I could agree with the evolution this if maybe the cow grew
a boxing club or
For some reason the duck had a thumb Little hand that would be cool maybe if the
shark had some horns and the goat became a Terminator and you know the fly somehow
adapted and grew an M249 squad automatic weapon that would be that would be sweet
you know that’d be a cool killer fly
So genetic information can only be duplicated or lost. New information is never
created. That is, that is perhaps the first law of procreation. The second law,
all organisms return to their natural state in the wild through
a variety of processes. So here Here is this is regarding the planting of crops
corn specifically The harvest of a hybrid corn plant won’t produce seed genetically
identical to the parent plant So since I don’t know exactly what the genetics are
in that new seed. I don’t want to plant it next year. I should add that Just
about all corn grown today is hybrid corn because it performs much better than
inbred corn
Even though I think this got a little mistaken because all the hybrid corn is
actually in bread corn. We’ll go over that in a moment So here’s another another
comment from a farmer Without getting too deep in eugenics science here Suffice it
to say that the second generation of plants do not always exhibit the benefits to
traits the hybrids were bred to exhibit for example, let’s say some farmer chose a
particular hybrid of corn because his soil is more sandy and he needs a variety
that could withstand a drier growing season. In the first growing season, the seeds
come all from the seed company and should exhibit the genetic traits that make it
more drought resistant. However, if the farmer harvested the corn and tried to use
those kernels as seeds in the next season, not all of the corn will demonstrate the
same genetic traits. That means a certain percentage of the crop will not be as
drought resistant as the first year. It may not survive or produce as well in sandy
soil.
So,
oh, she did it pretty good there. Now, the corn that they’re using, it’s bred to
be what it is. And it’s not because but all the stuff that they tried to bread
out of it they didn’t get it all it’s not a pure of that corn otherwise the
genetic information should be missing like a chihuahua doesn’t have you know much
left of the wolf it doesn’t have enough left of the wolf to make a wolf if you
kept breeding chihuahuas so and i’m gonna play this is a short video i think about
two minutes two and a half and I’m going to show you a little bit of the process
of all of this.
The majority of the corn you see is actually a hybrid plant. You know, we really
create inbreds first,
so essentially we’re creating the parents of the hybrids. What we do then is we’ll
make crosses between all these parents and evaluate essentially the children or the
hybrid from the result of that cross and then we try to sort it down and we have
to test that over years to find out which one is truly the best hybrid. The tassel
is where the pollen comes from and then you have the ear which is the silk so the
flower is actually separated in two separate components in the plant. What we have
to do in a breeding or so, we have to hand pollinate. So the seed we’re after,
you know, could be as much as a cup full of seed. And what hand pollination
entails is really, you know, controlling pollen flow. And you’ll see that when you
see the bags on the tassels and the bags on the the ear shoots. That’s the whole
concept is we need to control pollen flow. You’re physically moving pollen, yes. So
Once you get in bags and then we physically move it to where we want it to go. A
lot of it is maintaining seed of the parents so we can do what we want to do. If
we have a great parent, we need a lot of seed to create more hybrids. So really
it’s all about seed management, creating seed. When we do tassel, we’re doing that
to control pollen movement and saying we want the pollen from this plant to
pollinate this plant. So when you drive around, you’ll see these four rows
essentially with no tassels that are shorter, a taller row, and the pattern repeats
across the entire field. And that’s what we’re after. We’re wanting that pollen from
that one row to pollinate the other four rows. And if we’re successful, then we’ll
get ears of corn off of those four short rows, and we’ll harvest those. And then
that is a seed that actually goes into the seed bag to get sold to growers. When
you buy a bag of hybrid seed corn and you take that out, you can think there was
probably seven to 10 years of development time going in. It’s a lot like winning
the lottery. For that hybrid, it had to beat out so many other hybrids, so many
other parents were trying to get in that bag of seed, but that was the one that
won it.
So it’s a pretty special seed when you’re Okay,
so the organisms going back to their natural state is such a problem that the
manufacturers of these seeds are snipping off parts of the plant to make sure
certain plants can’t reproduce and then putting bags and like controlling it and
they’re doing lots of inbreeding with all the corn and so it’s a very highly
selective, highly controlled process and they kind of have to start from scratch for
every batch because after a or two of,
of they’re not, not so strict control. It just, the, the corn just goes wild. And
so that’s in plants. And so to demonstrate this law of organisms go back,
go
back to the nature in the wild. So we can look a little bit of animals here. And,
Okay, so this is an article from Gizmodo. “Genetically modified mosquitoes are
breeding in Brazil, despite biotech firms assurance to the contrary.”
An experimental trial to reduce the number of mosquitoes in a Brazilian town by
releasing genetically modified mosquitoes has not gone as planned. Traces of the
mutated insects have been detected in the natural population of mosquitoes, which was
never supposed to happen. The deliberate release of 450 ,000 transgenic mosquitoes in
Jocapina, Brazil, has resulted in the unintended genetic contamination of the local
population of mosquitoes.
I mean, well, nobody really cares about the mosquitoes, anyway, but, you know, oh,
mosquitoes.
The key feature of these bioengineered mosquitoes is a dominant lethal gene that
supposedly results in infertile offspring known as the F1 generation. By releasing the
0x513a mosquitoes into the wild, Oxitec hoped to reduce the population mosquitoes in
the area by 90 % while at the same time not affecting the genetic integrity of the
target population. I’m not sure how they could possibly claim that they wouldn’t
affect genetic integrity of the target population while they’re trying to do just
that. As researchers note in the study, the oxotec scheme worked at first, resulting
in a dramatic reduction in the size of the mosquito population. But at the 18 -month
mark, the population began to recover, returning to nearly pre -release levels.
So basically they got all these mosquitoes And they released 450 ,000 mosquitoes,
which let’s just say is like a fourth of the population of mosquitoes, who knows.
And so what the conspiracy kind of wants you to think is they got their little
crazy mosquito here.
And on the next batch, it’s gonna be the opposite. Like it’s gonna be majority
crazy mosquito and only the natural mosquito. But that’s not actually what happens.
What actually happens is there’s a little mutation, it just doesn’t matter.
And all of the natural mosquitoes will thrive again. So, and part of the report was
that, you know, they’re like, well, of course, the offspring of all the crappy
mosquitoes, of all the defective mosquitoes, like they don’t really have any. So I
don’t know how they could possibly, you know, infect the population that would just,
they couldn’t do that because it’s not going to spread. And then furthermore, they
found that all the female mosquitoes were refusing to mate with the mutated
mosquitoes. Like, they were just figuring out what was up, but there was some wrong
with them and they wouldn’t mate with them.
And so it just, it didn’t it didn’t matter. And it’s the same thing with the fake
pandemic.
They want you to think, even though it never happened, but even if it did, they
want you to think that they’re going to put some crazy super virus into the system,
or some crazy bacteria or something, some disease, and it’s just going to take over
the world, and we’re all going to be zombies. But that’s not how it works. It’s
anything like that’s been highly manufactured in some kind of lab, it just can’t
survive in the wild.
So some other examples of this stuff, you know, scientists breed glow -in -the -dark
rabbits. I believe they did the same thing with mice.
And then, let’s Glean green fluorescent protein received via DNA from father had been
implanted with growing sperm creating cells from a fluorescent mouse. There’s another
one. Yeah, so they did rabbits, they did mice, they did, I don’t really remember
what this was, they did it too. And here’s some, some plant,
they did a tobacco plant, they made to uh Green as well.
And so, you know, if they these are all laboratory stuff They when they’re done
with this they they actually just they killed all the rabbits. They killed all the
mice Same thing all tobacco, you know, but it don’t really matter though You know,
they want you to think that if they release it into the wild suddenly there’s gonna
be a bunch of Glowing the dark mice and rabbits and tobacco plants, you know
running around, but this ain’t true. I I mean, you got like a glow -in -the -dark
mouse. It’s probably more likely to be caught by predators anyway, you know, it’s
gonna stick out a bit um And so, you know another mice probably not gonna want to
breed with them and Even in this article the mouse that they said breed that it
was able to create offspring It was a miracle because they it was basically
infertile But they tried really hard to get it going and they and they managed to
get it and they they call it a miracle so like they just nothing nothing really
works in the wild and so because I want you to think you know they get your
little zombie rabbit it’s the same story as the mosquitoes and I want you to think
if they released in the wild there’d be three zombie rabbits and one one good one
but in the reality is the zombie ones all disappear and you just get you just get
the regular natural rabbits
So, you know, back to the, back to the wolf and the smug Chihuahua, you know,
there’s nothing, there’s hardly anything in the wolf left in the Chihuahua. You know,
what makes, what do you think would happen if we released the Chihuahua back into
the wild? You know, it’s just, I mean, it can’t even, it can’t even bite your
ankles with any force. You know, it’s not going to hunt anything. It’s too slow.
It’s too small. you know, it could be picked up by an eagle and eaten. It’s just,
it’s not gonna happen.
So, first law of procreation, genetic information can only be duplicated. Or lost.
New information is never created.
All organisms return to their natural state in the wild.
And if an organism goes too far from its natural state, it becomes sterile.
So we have, let’s go into this. So this is a, this is an article about hybrid
incompatibility. So that’s like when you, you breed two creatures together that are
like really close, like a horse and a donkey, and you get a mule.
So, hybrids between closely related species are often inviolable, or if they live,
they are sterile. The hybrid inviolability and sterility, collectively known as hybrid
incompatibility, can reduce the exchange of genetic variance between species. Thus,
hybrid incompatibility can be important in the process of speciation by acting as a
reproductive isolating barrier. hybrid incompatibility as a phenotype is unusual.
As it serves no apparent function. You get it is so common, naturalists and
philosophers since Aristotle have been puzzled by its existence. So the, so this guy
here, Norman A. Johnson, he’s like, oh my gosh, we breed these things that, that
are such identical looking creatures and all of their offspring either is stillborn
or it’s it’s sterile. And there’s no reason for that to happen. That’s ridiculous.
We can’t figure that out. Of course there’s a reason for it. There’s no apparent
function. That’s just so you can’t freaking create monsters. You’re like a hippogriff.
If you ever saw the Harry Potter story or whatever. And even if he did, and it
was a female, what’s it going to mate with? right
There’s nothing there’s nothing for the creature to mate with and So it’s really
there’s like a there’s like a rubber band around all the genetic code in the world
Where nothing can go too far from its natural state Because it becomes infertile The
key feature of these biogear mosquitoes is a dominant lethal gene That supposedly
results in infertile offspring as we read in the thing. But all that really happened
was is they selectively bred mosquitoes so far from their natural state they became
infertile.
You know, well that could have, they could have used CRISPR or something to put
something in there in the genes as well, but it still, it does the same effect, it
makes it infertile. And so some examples would be, you know, like a tiger and a
lion, you get a liger, it’s infertile. It also has bad joints and, and,
You know like they’re They’re not they couldn’t really survive in the wild. They’re
they’re too big. They’re too heavy They they get our they’re arthritic and they’re
infertile You breed a horse in a donkey get a mule
This creature works out okay, but it’s infertile it can’t breed bananas bananas or a
hybrid
Plantain and it’s so far from its in natural state, it has no seeds. You cannot
get anything out of a banana and plant it and make a banana tree. It doesn’t
happen. The bananas in the supermarket are an engineered product.
Seedless grapes, same thing. They’ve been inbred and played with so much.
The reason why they’re seedless is because they’re too far from their natural state.
They don’t have seeds. They can’t be planted. A tangelo. Same thing.
No seeds. It’s too far from its natural state.
And so, you know, if an organism goes too far from its natural state, it becomes
sterile.
So this one is a very, this is another interesting, this is a very interesting one.
Certain behaviors and genetic traits are amplified in different environments. These
traits are merely a change in behavior and or an amplification of existing genetic
code. And so this is the part where some people might be able to mistake,
oh they’re like, oh there’s some evolution right there. And he goes, no you got
radical things in the environment that are allowing certain genetic traits of the
individual of the organism to behave differently. And so let’s go over some examples
of this.
So single cell evolves large multicellular reform in just two years.
Researchers have discovered that environments favoring clumpy growth are all that’s
needed to quickly transform single celled in the complex multicellular organisms.
This simple procedure, as they describe, rapidly causes the evolution of tiny clumps,
yeast that have evolved to stay attached to each other, the better to survive the
selected pressure exerted by the scientists.
In an experiment where predators preferentially ate smaller prey unicellular algae
evolved into multicellular clusters with new forms and life cycles with all within
just 50 weeks. And here they got some little chart of oh it’s like staying together
oh it’s so evolved and it’s basically kind of the same thing for yeast that’s why
I just included that little diagram and so question is is this behavior of the
organism or is it evolution?
A macroevolution or even a microevolution would be an addition of genetic information.
So yeast is a single celled fungus but in the wild it sometimes grows in clumps.
This happens when a yeast cell clones itself butting an identical daughter cell, but
fails to pinch the clone entirely free. These cells continue to reproduce forming
clumps.
So by the way, all yeast is cloned. And so the question is,
is it behavior or evolution? And it’s not evolution because there’s no new genetic
information. It’s merely behavior. It literally, by forming clumps,
it skipped a process that it does a process was removed from its natural life cycle
so single celled you know yeast some more commentary on it he was also thinking
about one of the most famous evolution experiments this is the guy who was writing
the other Um, started by Richard Lensky more than 30 years ago.
Uh, E. coli colonies in Lensky’s lab have been maintained since 1988. They morphed
over the years in surprising ways. For instance, in 2003, Lensky and his colleagues
found that one population had evolved the ability to digest citrate, which E. coli
had never been known to do before. So, behavior? I I mean,
I think this is about as significant as a dog who’s eaten steak its whole life
finally succumbing to eating kibble. There’s no new genetic information here. It’s
just behavior.
And then they even admit honestly these statements can be debatable because primitive
forms of multicellular complexity often look like typical unicellular behavior.
So and that’s because there’s nothing different about what any of these yeast cells
are ever doing even though they never separated They’re all still acting independently
Of each other if they did happen to separate they would they would still be doing
the same thing There’s nothing. There’s not like a brain and the stomach and like
some kind of
You know a diversity of tasks. They’re all still just doing the same thing they
would always be doing.
Let’s see here. I
remember. Anyway, so the same thing as algae, you know, eventually clumps are formed
because it fails to separate.
and as a behavior evolution it’s just it’s just more behavior and that this is the
this is a different article and where they’re talking about well if we put different
predators that eat yeast and then the yeast decides to stick up for itself and all
stay together and they go well it’s evolution and it’s just like oh you know no no
no no and so and the real test is
that’s right that’s what this article was about the real test is is there ever like
yeast in the wild that does this naturally and and actually this this article is
all about that this is well actually we’ve known that yeast forms clumps in the
wild forever forever so it’s just basically some people just making a big stink
about something that’s been the way it is forever it’s nothing new yeast is never
turned into something that’s not yeast
it’s just not evolution and so we have this we have all these evidences of
different environments changing the behavior of organisms but there’s another level to
this and that is different environments causing different the way more than behavior
so it’s enabling certain organisms to to be a little different and so some
of of science sciences confused a lot of this stuff and so I would like we’re
gonna talk a little bit about the before the flood before his flood,
a little bit about that, what was going on with that with organisms. So, in
Genesis, and God said, “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and
let it divide the waters from the waters.” And God made the firmament and divided
the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the
firmament. So, there’s water below and above the firmament,
And it was so. And God called the firmament heaven.
And so I would say that if you called that heaven, that would be high in the sky.
And so, and the evening and the morning were the second day, and God said, “Let
the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let dry land
appear.” And it was so. And so There’s no mention of the waters above the heavens,
above the sky, being gathered. It’s only waters underneath. To explain this a little
bit more in the next chapter of Genesis,
we get, “The Lord had not caused it to rain upon the earth, but there went up
amidst from the earth and watered the whole face of the ground. So before the flood
there was no rain
but in the sky above the sky there was water
so maybe it looked like this i don’t know i don’t know what un -gathered water
looks like in the atmosphere above above the atmosphere or above the sky um i’m
kind of just kind of duplicating clouds which kind of seems like gathered water but
but i don’t know there was water above above the earth above the heavens and so we
know that there are some major differences that were the result of this I think
that the waters above the heavens did a lot to change the the atmosphere of the
earth I think that the pre -flood atmosphere was more dense and it probably had more
protection like UB protection from the Sun which which does a lot to destroy things.
And so, but we know, you know, before the flood, Jared lives 962 years.
Methuselah, an alleged portrait of him, 969. Lamek,
777. And then kind of very interestingly, Noah.
950. 350 of those years he was alive after the flood
and so I think it stands to reason that there were some some very long -lived
creature creatures that oh We’ll talk about that a little later
and so in the new atmosphere post post Noah’s
um or during the flood so the fountains of the deep and the windows of heaven were
stopped and the rain from heaven was restrained so and in this and this new
atmosphere which it can now rain god
said i do set my bow in the cloud and it shall be for a token and a covenant
between me and the earth the water shall no more become a flood to destroy all
flesh and so post flood it can now rain which means water is now gatherable above
the firmament or maybe it’s gatherable in the firmament I’m not sure and this new
atmosphere enables the appearance of rainbows of refracted light in the atmosphere
apparently that wasn’t possible before and as another consequence, man no longer lives
as long.
And so,
little bit of examples. So Abraham was born somewhere around 300 years after the
flood,
as it says in Genesis, 175 years.
But, and so that was, you know, about 300 years, 350 years, something after the
flood.
Maybe he met Noah, maybe not, I don’t know. There’s some more research I could have
done on this, but I just didn’t get it done.
And so there’s, it looks like there’s a settling down to the atmosphere, which
enabled people to live long, because Abraham lived 175 years so I think it’s
reasonable to say that there’s probably other other individuals around his time that
also lived as long but today no one lives over 100 I mean there’s a few few here
and there but boy it’s it’s less than 1 % um and the large creatures that are
sometimes dug up by archaeologists uh They just they don’t exist in this size today.
And so we’re gonna tie this into the new new atmosphere because there’s been some
experiments done
so from wire .com They found that dragonflies and beetles grew faster as well as
bigger and high oxygen environments while cockroaches grew slower and Remain the same
size all the Two bug species grew smaller than normal at low concentrations of
oxygen. So imagine you had a high concentration of oxygen and you amped up the
atmosphere, you know, the pressure, so you would have, say, if the atmosphere was
twice as dense, you’d have twice as much air, which means you’d have even more
oxygen, and then maybe you blocked all the UV or whatever solar phenomena might be
shortening our lives,
and you get bigger creatures. In fact some have even been found. How Titan Boa,
the 40 foot long snake was found. Lord of this jungle was a tiny spectacular
creature, was truly a spectacular creature, a snake more than 40 feet long and
weighing more than a ton. This giant serpent looks something like a modern day boa
constrictor. That’s probably because it was a bow constrictor because everything just
lived longer you know here’s a little a little dinosaur that they claim 31 feet
long macrosaurus rex some skeletons they claim they have a little example of it with
a person there but here’s a modern day version uh dario You know,
it’s it’s like it’s basically the same thing
So and it could be the atmosphere just made it grow a little bit differently That
form of function is the same. It looks pretty similar. It’s just smaller
Time something else There’s more more humorous to me than anything else, but you
know, maybe maybe a t -rex is really just a giant chicken I don’t know. I I don’t
know. I don’t think the T -Rex actually existed.
Another example, Megalodon. I mean, it’s just a giant grey -white shark.
Because everything lived longer back then, and sharks just don’t stop growing.
And Psalms, there go the ships, there is that Leviathan whom thou hast made to play
therein.” So there’s several kind of references to giant sea creatures in the Bible
and there’s you know lots of, lots of claims by sailors over the years about these
creatures and I think it’s possible that they are just leftovers from Noah’s flood
That maybe they survived the flood and they just kept they just lived so long
already and they’re just they were just still around for a while So, but I don’t
know Speculism speculation. So the laws of procreation genetic information can only be
duplicated or lost new information is never created This is what a mutation really
is it never creates anything all organisms are turned to their natural state in the
wild. If an organism goes too far from its natural state, it becomes sterile.
Certain behaviors and genetic traits are amplified in different environments. These
traits are merely a change of behavior and /or amplification of existing genetic code.
And one last little note, just to stick the knife in there, organisms only produce
their own kind.
You can you can breed all the dogs in the world, but you’re never gonna get
anything but a dog
and so Well, we have this next section, which is probably Somewhere around 20
minutes, but we’re kind of out of time so I don’t know if
We want to continue anyway if anyone has to leave or we can say prayer continue or
you want to maybe share next week
um i mean i could but it’s only like 20 minutes i don’t think it’s a whole i
mean share what we do like a half and a half or something
good i mean i mean we went over for samantha
we did i just wasn’t sure if it was a 20 minutes yeah go ahead but um so what
we can do then is yeah if anybody has any kind of questions or comments in there
let’s take a just a second to have anybody input and you know have something to
say right now and then we will go ahead and continue.
We’ll take two or three comments and then we’ll go ahead.
That’s a good one, Joyce. Yes, Mark, go ahead.
You are still muted.
You’re muted, Mark. There you go. Yep, you’re good. My church put on about 17 years
of really good presentation on evolution and really shot it down, especially the
macroevolution claims. But the presenter did say a point,
I thought, and I don’t know if this is disagreeing with what you’re saying, Mike,
or not, but he did say natural selection does exist, but I don’t think that’s what
you’re referring to as microevolution, but correct me if not, because,
as you were talking about, environment can change behavior, but it also can change
physically the species. I think a good example, and you correct me if you think I’m
not correct here, the mussox. Mussox is long -haired for warmth.
There’s many other animals in the Arctic and Antarctic that are suited for that
environment. And the question is, did they change because of the environment and
through national selection, or was there an actual micro evolution process, which will
say no to that that occurred. And the argument that they change is that they’re not
breeding with other buffalo or other ox, because of their species So what is it?
How do you account for those kinds of changes? Is it natural selection, natural
selection is different than micro -evolution or is there a mutation involved here or
not?
Yeah, sure. I’ll tell, I’d be happy to talk about that for a little bit in my
opinion.
So I started off with this presentation by offering some definitions of micro and
macro evolution. One of the reasons why I did that is because the way that
evolutionists talk, they never want to get nailed down on any definition. They’re
always changing it. And even if you go to one guy and he’s like, I believe this
and they’re like, well, this thing and this thing go say that that’s ridiculous. And
it’s obviously, this isn’t fake. You know, it’s a well -documented phenomena.
Then it’d be like, oh, well, maybe this guy over here, he said this. So maybe
that’s what’s going on. And so it’s really, there’s so much ambiguity in this system
and there’s a reason for it. And that’s because it’s false. They interject radical
amounts of ambiguity in order to create these strange positions that you find.
And so they will say stuff like what you just mentioned like these long haired
bison or whatever some long -haired whatever and like oh is that you know environment
now it’s got long hair and stuff and So my personal experience is about about every
ten years something radical comes up that they go Here’s the evolution and then in
a couple year five to ten years later It comes out that it was fake Or it comes
out that they’re like, oh We forgot about this particular thing that made that or
somebody was mistaken but like it’s literally just every time which is it’s kind of
actually the next session section of this presentation where I’m talking about lies
lies and more lies. I’m focusing on mutations so you’re saying there was a mutation
that created a musoclet that more selected for that environment.
It could be that that genetic information was already in that animal,
and it went to a new place where all of the ones that didn’t have longer hair
died. And so the thing is, is microevolution is a conservative process.
And so if you have all of these creatures that show up, and they have what appears
to be a new informational trait, that’s not true. What happened was all of the
other ones that had a different trait died, or they can’t survive in that area. And
so you’ll have this idea of a new creature, but it’s really the same genetic
information. And it’s just in a different environment. Well, I’m not sure I agree
with you. Some mutations made a big argument about how mutations will die out. But
aren’t there cases where they’re actually more selected for than the natural state?
you know, the shark and the fly. But you mentioned Chihuahua. Well, the Chihuahua
was a bred to compete with a wolf for survival in the wild. – No, no,
but the point of my example there was that there’s so much genetic information lost
and it creates what looks like a new breed of creature, but it came from a wolf,
right? It’s just you’ve lost so much new genetic information. So somebody goes, oh,
in this new state, We got all these longer creatures, it’s a mutation. And they’re
going to say, new information is added because we now have these long -haired
creatures that survive in the cold. And I go, well, no, there was probably, there
was already long -haired genetic information in that creature. It’s just now it’s in
this place and all the ones that can’t keep warm died. – Can you say that the
creatures change but not new genetic material like the mussox it’s changed but it’s
not because I’m confused just the loose word it’s the wrong word you should say it
hasn’t changed it has lost genetic information but that’s what that’s yet it’s more
natural it’s more suited for the environment than it was before so you know you
have a bunch of mussox and one had long hair and one had short hair and for
whatever reason the long hair is or insulating, then of course all the short hairs
are gonna die off in that region. – So there’s some mussox there from the beginning,
or the genetic makeup was there from the beginning. – You can’t create. – Okay, thank
you. – And it could even be that maybe the mussox hair, when it gets in a cold
environment, it doesn’t fall out, it grows longer. So it could even be,
’cause like dogs do that, they shed in the summer, like a lot of dogs do that. So
I don’t think it’s unreasonable that a mussox, whatever this creature is, would have
long hair in a colder environment. It just, if it doesn’t have that hot weather to
trigger whatever change in its body to let the hair fall out, then okay, fine.
It’s just, it’s really conservative versus creation of genetic information is really
where everything is because the key thing on evolution is we’re creating new
creatures and we’re doing that by creating genetic information. My question is about
natural selection. Do you believe natural selection exists? Yeah,
natural, I believe natural selection exists. I think that’s obvious. It’s just it
doesn’t create new genetic information and
selection process to create extra reasoning. – Thank you. – Let’s go on to the next
question. Carmen, you got your hand raised. Go ahead.
– Don’t forget to use the word adaptation, which is what you were talking about
growing the long hair. All the animals that live on the outside, for the winter
time, they grow inner hairs that are thicker and longer so they can keep warm.
You wonder how do the cows and the horses out in the field, how do they survive?
Why their legs don’t get frozen? And that’s because they have very few veins in
their legs, but also because they grow a whole set of hair underneath the visible
hair that’s on the outside. So, don’t forget to use the word adaptation.
Well, the evolutionist would say that adaptation is perfect for mutation.
Okay. Just looking in the comments real quick before we… Any other questions before
we have the final 20 minutes?
No, didn’t he Didn’t he say he’s not gonna do it now. He’s gonna do it next week.
No, he asked to continue now
Little break have people ask questions go ahead and finish Micah I’m as well as
only ten of us. I must have bored everyone to death and they left maybe they got
well times up So I just wanted to make sure people could read that but could
listen, but we’ll have it recorded They can watch the rest of it. So are you gonna
go ahead and go on it now? I’m gonna go ahead and go on. Yep. Go ahead. I’ll
stay and I didn’t know I thought he said that never mind. I had a suggestion
Whatever you want, then I don’t know No, I don’t I mean, I’m a doesn’t matter to
me I guess we’re already over and let’s just go ahead and have a closing prayer
We’ll have it next week and you can have more. I think it’s important for folks to
be able to hear this last section Um, so let’s go ahead and do that. Let’s have a
closing prayer. We can have some other Q &A or we can do open form and and whatnot
So, um, let’s go ahead Moses. Would you say the closing prayer for us? Who?
Moses. Oh, thank you during the father, thank you for this wonderful weather we’ve
had this day and
Like the A4 Micah for giving this lesson that he was able to teach us and please
help us in our arguments and helping to defend the cause of liberty and to bring
light to others and please help us to go about our night in safety and ask us in
the name of Jesus Christ, amen. Amen. Amen. Okay, we can do it.
