Member training from August 4th 2025.
Tonight I walked through a powerful training focused on the historical roots and enduring relevance of the conspiracy against liberty and religion, as documented by America’s Founders. We examined letters and writings from figures like Abigail Adams, George Washington, John Jay, and others, who openly warned about the Illuminati, Jacobins, and their coordinated efforts to undermine virtue, faith, and constitutional governance. I highlighted how these leaders didn’t just theorize—they acted: sharing books, writing letters, and using their influence to awaken others. We discussed how their courage and clarity should inspire us today to recognize the same patterns, educate our communities, and resist modern iterations of this conspiracy. The goal is not just awareness, but principled action rooted in truth, scripture, and historical precedent.
Help support ad free content with a one time donation or becoming a member today.
Thank you to our sponsors
https://connollyandsonsconcrete.com/
https://www.dentistry4health.org
http://www.highercallingfirearms.com
http://www.americanappliancehvac.com
https://insurewithcompass.com/sbarlow.html
TRANSCRIPT
Dear Lord, as we come together, we are so grateful for the opportunity to discuss
things that are important for Utah, and the cleansing and healing of our state, and
that we’ll have great discernment and minds of purity.
Our discernment will give us safety and protection throughout our lives, and that it
will be wise and no grateful for the opposition and all things because it really
teaches us so many truths. And we grateful for those who gathered this night
grateful for Ben in his knowledge name of Jesus Christ. Okay,
So starting the 7th to the 14th, invasion will be on sale for half off.
So it’ll be $10. And so this is a great opportunity for you to go along with our
project of distributing at least three copies out to individuals. If you’ve done that
before in the past, this gives you an opportunity to be able to more easily
distribute more copies to people that you are looking at getting to. It’s a good
opportunity to share this. We’ll be posting this on our social media and our email
list. Encourage you to share that with others so that more people, even if you’re
not maybe buying it for them, you can say, “Hey, this book I’ve been telling you
about, it’s half off. Great time to go get it.” We’re hoping this will help
increase distribution in both the idea of people buying multiple copies to distribute
themselves to people that they know, as well as maybe people that were on the
fence, and being able to pick up a copy, it was funny on Tuesday at the event,
I was talking to, as Carmen was saying, I was talking to people and they were
asking questions and as I was answering the questions, and I made sure I avoided
the idea of, well, it’s in the book, like that’s just, to me, that’s just cheesy
and slimy and so, I wanted to answer them, you know, in a way that was honest and
forthright, but it said that, you know, there is more information that is in the
book. And so, after asking questions and me answering the questions, they said,
okay, you finally convinced me I’ll buy the book. And so this is just a good
opportunity to do that. So encourage you starting from the 7 to the 14th to take
the opportunity to Get copies and distribute them and let people know about it. Is
anybody have any questions about this?
Okay Go ahead So I just we’ve gone through the member manual and so now I what
I’m going to be doing is go I’m going to be putting the short clips that we do
during training into one video. So that’ll be in the member portal as well. But I
also want to, as specific examples of individuals, like last week,
I talked about Simon and the activities that he did. And this week,
I got a report from somebody else. And he’s not even a member of the Tree of
Liberty Society that is doing what I’m hoping more of our members will do. So I
wanted to bring him up as an example of the things that he’s doing. So this
individual is named CJ and he’s from Phoenix. And he’s been texting me and he said
that these bootcamp classes need to be disseminated everywhere. We need to incorporate
the Declaration of Independence today that you did. Why? Because you answer the
question that people don’t know to ask, how do we know the founders were right? So
he’s, you know, this non -member and he’s just really excited about it. And He’s
like, we need to get this video out to more people. He says, and then followed up
the day or two later, says, I’m meeting some people tonight and we are watching the
Deseret Amen Independence Day video. I want to see their thoughts on it.
I see many competent leaders in this new revolution where I am in Arizona. And so
he’s taking the videos. I don’t, there’s no DVD of it, but He’s like, he watched
the video and he liked it. And he is taking it to, well, he’s got the link and
he’s showing people. I don’t know if he’s on his computer or his iPad or on their
computer or television, but he’s going to individuals’ homes and he’s going this
video in people’s homes. And so this is another example, an implementation of doing
what I’m talking about in the member manual. And so he reported back and he said
afterwards, after he showed the video, the sisters had never heard anything about
Deseret Independence Day and they were shocked. They didn’t know what to say. It was
a very good evening and the video sparked major curiosity. And so this guy is not
a member of the Tree of Liberty Society, but he’s sharing it and helping more
people know about the Tree of Liberty Society. So if he’s doing it, I’m hoping that
this as an example, and this is a motivation to get all of us to follow that
example. Even if we’re not going to people’s homes and saying, “Hey, watch this
video with me,” we’re sharing the link with people, because that’s something that is
even easier than what he did. But he’s out there, and he’s not LDS.
And so this idea of desert independence and what happened in the state of Deseret
was something that he wasn’t aware of, but he’s these people that he went to visit,
they were LDS. And so you’ve got this guy, he’s not a member of the Tree of
Liberty Society, he’s not a member of the LDS Church, but he’s going around and
he’s sharing these presentations with people. And so it really shows how easy it is
to do and that it’s something that we can all find a way that we can implement
that with, even if, whether it’s not as in -depth as he’s doing, which is I just
love, but whatever way that we’re doing it We need to be stepping it up and doing
more. So Mark. Yes. Yes, can you give us a little overview of that video? I just
first heard of it and is it available online for free? Yeah for free.
Yep. It’s on our YouTube channel It’s on our website. If you just search on our
YouTube channel for desert independence. It basically goes through the history of how
we how the Latter -day Saints came to Utah and then the process of how they were
essentially not blackmailed but I’m trying to think of the other word that when
you’re under threat of violence you are compelled to do what they want you to do
and Um, it shows me the history of that and how we basically got to the situation
that we are today, um, when we started off as a free state, promoting liberty in
the Constitution to where today we are the exact opposite. Durres is the word you’re
looking for. Thank you under duress. Appreciate that.
Anybody else.
Okay. Okay. Let’s go on to, oh, and then he, oh, he followed up,
he said, I asked them point blank, why haven’t you heard of it? It was a
devastating and very important event. I don’t know why it’s been hidden. And so it’s
just really interesting to see the reaction and the impact that these presentations
have on people that are just thirsty for this information. So it’s fantastic.
Okay, tonight’s training of the founders and the conspiracy. [BLANK _AUDIO]
– I apologize. – That’s okay, I appreciate it.
Alrighty, so as I’ve talked about in the past, I’ve quoted different Founding Fathers
talking about the Illuminati and the Jacobins, but there is,
as we go through their writings and their letters, there is a ton.
And it’s important for us to know this because of course, as a part of our
mission, we are working to build the understanding and adherence to the principles
that have built free nations. We’re working to expose the satanic conspiracy and see
what the founding fathers said does that, and then build effective resistance to that
conspiracy. So, you know, sometimes when we are talking about the conspiracy,
we feel shy, we think we don’t wanna get made fun of, and so we’re not really
confident in that. And so when our confidence wanes, maybe we can look to these
people that we have common respect for with others that have talked about these
things. And knowing what they’ve said will help us be more confident when talking to
others about these things. Because, you know, you can say, well, you know what
George Washington said? Well, you know what John Adams said? You know what his wife
said? And so Just looking at different examples and understanding those examples will
help us to be better at helping to expose the conspiracy and to talk to others
about it so they know what’s going on and so they know what to do about it. So I
really want to go into depth tonight on this topic. And so there’s,
we have a letter, I’m going to be doing a lot of reading tonight, so forgive me,
but I think it’s important just to look at the documents, the source documents. We
have a letter between Abigail Adams and her son, Thomas, in 1798,
Abigail, I’m sorry, Thomas writes to his mom Abigail and says the present tranquility
which pervades the United States, I sincerely hope to be but vengeance asleep.
And when the recent measures of the French government shall be known, It will be
time, in my opinion, for it to rouse from slumber and grapple with its antagonist.
If there exists a man shameless enough to tell the people of the United States that
the cause of the French Republic is their cause, I am glad there lives another man
to tell the people that he lies. And so he’s getting into,
of course, his mother and his father Talked much about who was actually involved in
the French Revolution and that the friend the cause of the French Revolution was not
the American cause and And and so he’s was grateful that there were people out
there Exposing the real root of the French Revolution
It says it has he not discovered upon every occasion since his return A maligned
spirit, a base temper, fit only for a devil or one of the Illuminati. They knew
the enemy, they knew the cause behind these things, and they were not afraid to
name it.
Then we have Abigail Adams writing a letter to her friend, Mary Smith Cranch in
1798. And Abigail said, “To destroy and undermine religion has been the chief engine
in the accomplishment of this mighty revolution throughout Europe. We have felt no
small share of the baleful influence of the age of reason. But to have a thorough
idea, thorough idea of the deep late system, you must read a work lately published
called “Proofs of the Conspiracy Against All the Religions and Governments of Europe”
by John Robeson, Professor of Natural Philosophy in the University of Edinburgh. So
forgive the So, forgive the grammatical errors, this is the direct copy and paste of
the way that she spelled and punctuated and used capitalization and whatnot,
so just FYI. It’s with all of these, they did not have standardized grammar back
then. She continues on, “I have made the extract from his letter at length and sent
it to Dr. Belknap, together with Robeson’s work, which fully unfolds the whole scheme
and displays the effects of the principles in the revolutions in Europe to their
full extent. I thought I could not do a better service than to put our countrymen
upon their guard. So I want you to pay attention to this because this right here,
there’s going to be, I think you’re gonna see a trend amongst certain individuals
and what they did. So just kind of just let this soak in of what she’s writing to
her friend and she’s telling her about this book that exposes what’s going on and
then why did she do it? Okay, think about that. So in another occasion,
we have a letter written to Abigail Adams from a Jeremy Belknap where he says,
“I have read Robeson’s conspiracy with astonishment that contains the seeds of all
the mischiefs which we have been tormented with for the past for the years past.
God grant we may be able to stop the progress of this worse than mortal
pestilence.” So he’s calling the conspiracy something that is worse than a you know,
a leg that is upon mankind. This is a very dangerous thing that we’re dealing with.
And he says, “Thinking men are very much alarmed about the matter. The book is
getting into repute, notwithstanding the account, which the analytical reviews have
given against it. Are they, are not they probably among the Illuminati?” Let’s let
me go back here. So isn’t that interesting, right? The book is being spread around.
People are knowing about it. People are writing about it. People are talking about
it. People are sharing it with others and so those in the establishment, those in
the conspiracy controlled media, are giving it bad reviews. They’re making fun of it.
They’re mocking it. They’re saying that it’s, you know, they’re giving it all kinds
of criticisms and he’s saying, of course, who’s going to do that, but those that
are being exposed by it because the references and you know the the foundation of
these books are so solid that there’s no way that anybody could honestly go against
them unless they were a part of it. And he calls it out. He calls it for what it
is. Anybody that’s criticizing it is probably a part of the conspiracy.
So now we go to a Reverend G .W. Snyder to George Washington in 1798.
He writes to him and says, “It was sometimes since that a book fell into my hands
entitled ‘Pruce of the Conspiracy’ by John Robison.” Robison, which gives a full
account of a society of Freemasons that distinguishes itself by the name of
Illuminati, whose plan is to overturn all government and all religion, even natural,
and who endeavor to eradicate every idea of a supreme being and distinguish man from
beast by his shape only. So understanding that part is really important because it
shows a lot of things that we see today with evolution and whatnot as part of the
program. A thought suggested itself to me that some of the lodges in the United
States might have caught the infection and might cooperate with the Illuminati or the
Jacobin Club in France. Fauché is mentioned by Robeson as a zealous member,
and who can doubt of Genet and Adé, have not these their confidence in this
country? They use the same expressions and are generally men of no religion.
I send you the proof of the conspiracy, which I doubt not will give you
satisfaction and afford you matter for a train of ideas that may operate to our
national Felicity Okay, so I’m gonna ask a question kind of and it’s it’s gonna
repeat itself future on but we’ve got I think we’ve got enough examples here of
What are these people doing? What what what do we see in common? between these
individuals and their letters to others.
Anybody see a common thread?
Mark. Well, you see education that they’re reading. You see concern that this is
going to contaminate this new nation, you see no delay in trying to expose this to
each other since the book — these quotes are from the same year that the book was
read.
Those are a couple of things off the top of my head, I see. Yeah, those are all
great examples. Is there anybody else?
They’ve been organized for a long time? Yes, the conspiracy has been organized.
So what’s the United example of the response to that organization?
So they’re educating, but they’re not only– they’re writing letters, but they’re
sending them the book itself. They’re saying, hey, there’s this book, and here’s a
copy of it. They’re wanting others to understand what’s going on and so that they
can take effective action against it. And who are they contacting? They’re not
afraid. They’re like, you know, George Washington is a man of, you know, great fame
and great influence. And he says, you know, I want to get you a copy of this
because you can help spread the word. You can help others understand this. You can
use your influence. Abigail Adam’s talking to people of influence. You know,
they’re getting the book in their hands, not being afraid to talk to others, being,
oh, what are they gonna call me? Right, you had Belknap saying, yeah, people are
talking bad about this book, but I’m not gonna be afraid to talk about it. I’m
gonna talk about it, and I’m gonna share the book with other people. – I think they
are very afraid, but they’re not afraid about other people’s opinion. They’re afraid
about the harm this would do to their fellow Americans. – Yeah. And afraid what
their maker is going to call upon them and say, what did you do to help others?
You knew this information. What did you do to help others know it too?
So again, so continuing on with this George Washington and GW Snyder conversation,
George Washington responds to him and says, “I have heard much of the nefarious and
dangerous plan and doctrines of the Illuminati, but never saw the book until you
were pleased to send it to me.” So he’d heard about it, but he wasn’t able to get
all of the data until GW was willing to send him the book.
Not having heard from GW Snyder, GW, George Washington wrote again and said,
“Some weeks ago I sent you a letter.” Oh no, I’m sorry, this was a goof up. So
he hadn’t received George Washington’s response. And so Snyder wrote to George
Washington. Yeah, okay, that Snyder wrote to GW. So I wrote that correctly, I just
didn’t read it correctly now. So GW Snyder writes back to Washington saying, “Some
weeks ago I sent you a letter with Robeson’s proof of a conspiracy, which I hope
you have received. I have since been more confirmed in the ideas I had suggested to
you concerning an order of men who in Germany have distinguished themselves by the
names of Illuminati, German Union, reading societies, and in France by that of the
Jacobin Club, that the same are now existing in the United States.
It continues on, it has also occurred to me that you might have had ideas to that
report when you disapproved of the meetings of the democratic societies, which
appeared to me to be a branch of that order, though many members may be entirely
ignorant of the plan. So this is especially during the, what’s it called,
the whiskey rebellion, which was something that was led by the Jacobins in the
United States against Washington and the federal government’s tax on whiskey. And so
he wrote against the meetings of the democratic societies because they were in
organized conspiracy to undermine the government of the United States.
And so he’s bringing that up again reminding him of what he noticed that he did
and said that must be because you knew about them. So those men who are so much
attached to French principles have all the marks of Jacobinism. They first cast off
all religious restraints, and then became fit for perpetrating every act of
inhumanity. And it is remarkable that most of them are actually scoffers at all
religious principles.
It is not there a striking similarity between their proceedings and those of many
societies that oppose the measures of our present government. Even in this small
place, the French faction is very numerous. Their expressions are like those of
bloody lutetia, their sentiments in exact unison with those of the Jacobin Club.
So he’s pointing out these similarities, these consistencies between these different
organizations and how they are all following the same pattern of the Jacobin Club,
recognizing it as this unified conspiracy, even if they have different names, they’re
all united in the same ideas, same strategies of making fun of religion,
getting rid of religion in their life.
And so he continues on, they said they are laboriously employed to excite discord,
to extinguish public virtue, to break down the berries of religion. Do we? I mean,
amazing. It’s this is the same program we see today. You know, the public virtue
that we see today getting rid of would be something that, you know, they could have
never gotten away with in the 1790s. But the public virtue that they had,
then they were working the other mind. And so however, whatever virtue is still
intact, it’s their job to get rid of and to make fun of and to break down. to
establish atheism and to work the downfall of our civil and religious liberty.
Should their perfidious scheme succeed, I tremble even at the imagination of the
consequences, what would become of our Columbia? So I hope I’m not boring you
because this to me, I just find it fascinating looking through these letters and
their discussions of writing about this conspiracy that they were facing. The same
conspiracy that we faced today, they were facing and the conversations that they had
about it to me are just fascinating. And so Washington responds, thanking him for
the book, but that he didn’t get several of the letters. And then on the 24th of
October of ’97, he sends one final letter to Snyder and says, “Rev.
Sir, I have your favor of the 17th instant before me, and my only motive to travel
you with the receipt of this letter is to explain and correct a mistake which I
perceive the hurry in which I am obliged often to write letters had led you into.
It was not my intention to doubt that the doctrines of the Illuminati and principles
of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more
fully satisfied of this fact than I am. So he says that he is fully satisfied of
the fact that the conspiracy, the Illuminati and the Jacobins, are fully spread
within the United States and spreading their influence within that system.
And so they were able, so he continues on, he, Washington used his influence to be
able to expose this and Others were working to use their influence to tell others
about what was going on and how they could learn more about it and what their
goals were, and listed principles that they could use to identify the conspiracy.
So no matter what they called it, they could say, “Oh look, they’re following XYZ.
We know they’re a part of that same conspiracy.” We have here a letter from John
Adams to all caught in 1798, he says, “I hope the post office will not be robbed
by any of the societies of Illuminati, German Union, United Irishmen, et cetera,
who are said to be so inquisitive in post offices in America as well as Europe.”
And so in his letter, he’s saying, “I’m hoping these letters don’t get stolen by
the conspiracy.
I was not afraid to name these organizations by name and what their agenda is and
the things that they might do.
And we have here, John Jay, the first Supreme Court Justice of the United States.
And you have another man, Jenediah Morris. Jenediah Morris was a congressional
minister and written to John Jay, the chief of Supreme Court Justice, citing the
second Psalm and the 26th chapter of Isaiah. Morse spoke in apocalyptic terms of the
attacks on religion, the destruction of the true witnesses, and the rising power of
the beast, associating them with philosophism or atheism and Jacobinism.
The pamphlets Morse enclosed with his letter probably included Nathaniel Emmons’
discourse delivered on May 9, 1798, and spoke about proofs of the conspiracy by
Robeson. So we have this influential pastor who gives prayers and talks in Congress,
and he is writing letters about the conspiracy to a member of the Supreme Court,
very influential man, one of the founding fathers and was willing to stake his
reputation on this and to talk to him about it. Mark, yes. I think it’s important
we all remember that John Jay is one of the three authors of the federal’s papers.
Yes. He wrote many of the essays which explained the Constitution to the American
people. Absolutely. Thank you.
And And so in this letter, so he gets, he gets these pamphlets John Jay does from
Jedediah and he responds to Jedediah Morse and says,
thank you for the interesting pamphlets you was so kind as to send with your
letter. Much ill, ill use has been and will yet be made of secret societies,
I think with you that they should not be encouraged. I suspect that the Jacobins
are still more numerous, more desperate and more active in this country than is
generally supposed. So in his position of authority, and reading those materials that
were shared with him, he was able to recognize how influential and how widespread
that these conspirators were within the country, and that he recognized the general
ignorance of the population of this conspiracy. And so these people of influence were
working hard to do that. And in fact, Jededi Morse was a pastor and not only did
he speak about these things in letters, but he gave talks warning the public at
large about the conspiracy, which I’m going to quote from a little bit later
tonight, but it was something that he was not afraid to do. He was using his
influence and his reputation to help others be warned once he was warned.
So another time Abigail was really
just voluminous in her writings about the conspiracy to individuals. She was looking
for individuals to write letters to. Hey, did you hear about the conspiracy? Hey,
did you read this book? proves to the conspiracy. And so there’s this woman that
she wrote a letter to, Mercy Otis Warren, was an American activist poet. She was a
playwright and a pamphleteer during the American Revolution. And during the years
before the revolution, she had published poems and plays that attacked royal authority
in Massachusetts and urged colonists to resist British infringements on colonial rights
and liberties, okay? So you have both of these women which were using their
influence to help spread the cause of liberty and warn others about the conspiracy.
So in this letter, Abigail writes to Mercy and says, “As I have an opportunity by
the Lieutenant Governor, I send you a late publication by Abby Burrell.” So she’s
sending books, she’s sending people, I mean, proofs of the conspiracy, and she’s
sending people copies of the memoirs illustrating the history of Jacobinism, she’s
just getting these books out. She’s like, “Hey, dude, there’s a conspiracy going on.
You got to know about it,” which will remove, I presume, all doubts from your mind,
respecting the existence of such a person as Weishaupt. “When you have read the
books, you will oblige me by returning them to judge crunches.” The Ave was the
writer of the history of the French clergy. You will perceive that he is a bigoted
Catholic, but a man of science and great industry. The system which he discloses
freezes one with horror. So basically what she’s saying is, yeah, the author of the
Jacobin book is a Catholic, but it’s okay. The information he’s got in this book is
solid. So it’s like, yeah, you know, We differ religiously, but this book is solid.
Don’t worry about it. It was reserved for Weishaupt to put in practice the
principles of Voltaire and the whole Junctu of French philosophers aided by Frederick
the Great as he is called, okay? So again, I hope we’re seeing another pattern
here. This is a pattern of women.
They are using their voice. They’re not just saying, “Oh, that’s the man’s job,” you
know, which there are roles of men and women, but they felt themselves, their duty
to help warn their neighbor. And so she was sending books out to men. She was
sending books out to women saying, “Hey, check this out. Look what’s going on. Make
sure you take action on this. Make sure you learn about it. Make sure you spread
the information to others.” And she didn’t just kind of hide away and say, “That’s
John’s job.” No, she took charge and she did the work as well, in addition to John
doing the work. Yes, Mark? >> Yes, in her book club we talked about Mercy Otis
Warrant. She may have been considered behind Sam Adams as the founder of the
revolution. She was a pamphleteer, She was a writer. She role -played all, you know,
attacking and exposing the British tyranny. One of the really great people of the
revolution. And as for Abigail Adams, most consider her a founding father.
She had tremendous influence as an advisor on her husband. She was his main advisor.
Thomas Jefferson had such great respect that he They write back and forth to each
other.
These weren’t just any women. These were some of the great leaders of the family of
our country. >> Absolutely. Thank you.
>> So going back to Geneleia Morris, this is in a talk that he gave in 1799 for
present dangers and duties of citizens of the United States. He says, This is a
talk that he gives in church. Who would like to see this talk given in their
church? The similarity in the movements, the principles, the views of the Illuminati,
and the societies which we have mentioned render it highly probable that the latter
are the genuine offspring of the former. So he’s like, hey, yeah, these groups are
so similar that we know that they are connected to each other. The connection indeed
can be traced with the evidence of probability, if not certainty. Yes,
that was the uncommon, unstandardized spelling. Professor Robeson asserts upon credible
evidence that the Jacobin Club at Paris was formed by the advice and under the
direction of some German deputies from the Society of the Illuminati, who by request
of Meribus and others came to Paris in 88, who illuminate the great national lodge
of Freemasons in that city. So you’ve got this pastor giving a talk in church,
warning the people about the conspiracy and not just warning them about it exists,
but he’s educating them, he’s telling them, laying out how it works and how they’re
connected and what their history is. And so that his parishioners weren’t just
ignorantly being titillated with fascinating facts about drama and rumors going on.
No, they were becoming educated. They knew the history of it so that then they
could act informed and speak in an informed way to others once they heard his
preaching.
But we also have wise men, people that did things that I highly respect,
like the Declaration of Independence. Thomas Jefferson authored that and said some
wonderful things. But for whatever reason, either his ignorance or being tricked,
I don’t know. But he was on the opposite side of Abigail Adams,
the opposite side of John Jay, the opposite side of George and John Adams, the
opposite side of this pastor. And so in a letter, he wrote to Bishop James Madison,
the cousin of the president, James Madison, says, “I have lately by accident got a
sight “of a single volume of the Abbey Burrell’s “Antisocial Conspiracy,
which gives me the first idea “I have ever had of what is meant by the Aluminism
against which Illuminati Morse as he is now called. So that was the, that was the,
they were mocking the pastor that I just quoted as he was Illuminati Morse because
there he goes talking about the Illuminati again as his, as his ecclesiastical and
monarchal associates have been making such a hue and cry. And so he’s like,
yeah, because The guys are — him and his associates in other churches are
supporting the monarchy, their monarchists, because they’re exposing the Illuminati
conspiracy. So he’s making fun of them, and he’s smearing them with — calling them
monarchists by saying that they are exposing the Illuminati.
Yes, Mark? >> Yes, I’ve done some studying on Jefferson and I have a speculation as
to what was going on here. Jefferson was very, very loyal to reason and of course
the cover for the French Revolution was the era of reason. And they used that also,
of course, to discount Christianity, but my assessment that he was blinded by that
label at cover for the conspiracy and like so many today there are a lot of wise
people discount the conspiracy but I over and over again I see it’s just ignorance
because they don’t understand conspiracy they don’t understand the power influence
techniques the ammo and so forth so that’s my hunch is that he was so enthralled
by the era of reason of the French Revolution and that era,
not just at France, but in the UK as well. He wasn’t willing to look deeper into
the possibility of this massive conspiracy. – Yeah,
not only did not look deeper, but he made fun of and mocked those that did.
– Yeah. So Burrell’s own, which is not reason, right? So he was violating what he
said that he wanted to stick to and which is why reason alone is dangerous and why
sticking to, you know, having God’s word as the verifier of your reason is
important. But Burrell’s own parts of the book are perfectly the ratings of a
bedlamite. But he quotes largely from Weishaupt, whom he considers as the founder of
what he calls “the order.” As you may not have had an opportunity of forming a
judgment of this cry of “Mad Dog,” which has been raised against his doctrines, I
will give you the idea I have formed from only an hour’s reading of Burrell’s
quotations from him, which you may be sure are not the most favorable.
Weisop seems to be an enthusiastic philanthropist. He is among those, as you know,
the excellent price and priestly also are, who believe in the indefinite perfect
ability of man. He thinks he may in time be rendered so perfect that he will be
able to govern himself in every circumstance so as to injure none, to do all the
good he can, to leave government no occasion to exercise their powers over him, and
of course to render political government useless. This, you know, is Godwin’s
doctrine. And this is what Robeson, Borel, and Morse have called a conspiracy against
all government. So he’s again mocking them and saying, “What reasonable person would
call that a conspiracy against government?” Weisot believes that to promote this
perfection of the human character was the object of Jesus Christ. To me,
that’s just smacks of, you know, when, When atheists will quote Jesus just they kind
of have that same air about them and the idea that wise hop is Promoting what
Jesus Christ promoted is ridiculous Well in the fact that everybody’s been saying as
as was quoted earlier That the whole goal of the Illuminati and the Jacobins was to
destroy religion in the first place Exactly. Well, that’s what they all say. Yeah,
absolutely.
So he continues on. He says that his intention, meaning Weishaupt’s intention, was
simply to reinstate natural religion and by diffusing, meaning just religion of this
reason, and by diffusing the light of his morality to teach us to govern ourselves.
His precepts are the love of God and love of our neighbor. And by teaching and a
sense of conduct, he expected to place men in their natural state of liberty and
equality. He says, “No one ever laid a sure foundation for liberty than our grand
master, Jesus of Nazareth.” And that statement to me falls flat,
and I’ll tell you, but I wanted you to remember it because of something he said in
a different instance in the letter to John Adams. He continues on, he says, “The
means he proposes to effect this improvement of human nature are to enlighten men to
correct–
by irreproachable means, suffices for our fallicity. This tranquility of our
consciousness is not troubled by the reproach of aiming at the ruin or overthrow of
states or thrones, as Weishoff lived under the tyranny of a despot and priests. He
knew that caution was necessary even in spreading information and the principles of
pure morality. He proposed therefore to lead the Freemasons to adopt this object and
to make the objects of their institution the diffusion of vert science and virtue.
There is no virtue in science, but I digress. He proposed to initiate new members
into this body by gradation, so he knows about the levels within levels, proportion
to his fears of the thunderbolts of tyranny. This has given an air of mystery to
his views was the foundation of his banishment and the subversion of the Masonic
order, and is the color of the ravings against him of Robeson, Burrell, and Morse
whose real fears are that the craft would be endangered by the spreading of
information, reason, and natural morality among men. So again, he’s attacking the
character of Robeson, Burrell, and Reverend Morris by saying that they’re only afraid
of people getting the truth. And so, I want to compare that. Hold on. Wait.
He’s also saying that they practice priestcraft and that’s what they’re worried that
their paychecks are going to be challenged by this notion. Right. Yeah. Absolutely.
Thank you. So for more information on what the conspiracy, what the Illuminati and
the Jacobins and how they operate, what their goals were, what they said, their
admissions on these topics. I encourage you to go back and watch our training from
the 6th of November, 2023 and the 13th of November, the same year. And I think it
will enlighten you onto his best case scenario,
short -sightedness and why it’s so important that we, Again, as I mentioned earlier,
rely on scripture.
So again, oh, I did the thing out of order. So he wrote a letter to Adams in
April of 1823, where he says, the day will come when the mystical generation of
Jesus by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin will be classed
with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter. And then in
1819, he said to William Short, the immaculate conception of Jesus, his deification,
the creation of the world by him, his miraculous powers, his resurrection and visible
ascension, his corporeal presence in the Eucharist, the Trinity, original sin,
atonement, regeneration election, orders of hierarchy, et cetera, invented by ultra
Christian sex, unauthorized by a single word, ever uttered by him.
And so he was definitely believed that the divinity of the Savior and the fact that
he was Savior and that he was resurrected and ascended to heaven was all fables
made up by Christian priests to deceived the masses.
And so he rejected the core tenets of Christianity, which also leads to why he was
sucked in so well by the teachings of Weishaupt and the Jacobins.
So, but these wise men, they were not, they were undeterred by the mocking of the
paper editors that were reviewing the books of people like Jefferson and they they
were not going to stop talking about it. And so in another letter from John Jay to
Jed and I Morris John Jay says the facts which you have given to the public
relative to the conduct of France and our revolution as well as your strictures on
the designs and intrigues of the alumnus have to a certain extent been useful. They
have made proper impressions on many sedate and tenant men, but I suspect they have
detached very few of the discipline adherence of the party. As yet,
there appears but little reason to believe that “philosophism” is losing ground in
our country. There is indeed less said about it, but indications of immorality are
neither less frequent, nor more odious, and disgraceful and common estimation than
here too for. A moral epidemic seems to prevail in the world, what may be its
duration or the limits of its ravages, time, and only ascertain. And so John Day is
very much discouraged by the influence of the conspiracy and that it has on the
population and that their agenda is growing despite the efforts of men like Jedi
Morse. And so what it means to me is that more people needed to stand up more
people needed to not be afraid of what Thomas Jefferson and the newspapers were
saying about those that were exposing the conspiracy that they needed to be able to
have more people say say yeah, these guys are right and we need to stand up
against it. They didn’t want to talk about it openly, kind of like how people
during the 80s and 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s didn’t want to be called communists,
but they would always promote the principles of communism. So they’re like, oh, I’m
not an illuminist, I’m not a Jacobin. And then as they go on and promote the
principles of Illuminati, of the Illuminati. And so it’s important that we not just
focus on names, and I think that would maybe one of the reasons why they weren’t
as successful is because they did focus on names. It’s important that we focus on
the principles. We need to know the names, we need to know the history and how
they change so we can discuss those principles so we can show the connection from
the conspiracy today to then, but it also people need to understand that it’s not
about just getting rid of the CFR, just getting rid of the UN, just getting rid
of, you know, all whatever name you want to give it, but having people understand
the principles that these people are implementing, so that way when a different
organization hops up to implement those things, they understand it’s the same exact
conspiracy.
Real quick, Mark, I’m just gonna finish it up. So I’m hoping that we are emboldened
to stand for truth and speak boldly, knowing great people have blazed the trail
before you, right? And not be afraid to talk about it. Be a George Washington, be
a John Jay, be a Abigail and a John Adams.
And that way we can rid our garments of the blood of this generation as they,
because we have been there to warn our neighbor.
So With that, we’ll go ahead and go to Mark real quick.
>> Yeah, principles. If you don’t know the principles of right or wrong,
what is justice, what is liberty, what is the proper old government, how you don’t
know why to get rid of them. If you don’t know why to get rid of them, you’re
not going to get rid of them. And I think Jefferson was, in your quotes there on
Jefferson was really revealing what went on, why he was conned. He was being conned.
He was bringing up the words of Beishaw, pronounced Beishaw, words of promoting
science, virtue, even liberty, and Jefferson went for the bait.
You know, this is what Christ talked about, wolves in sheep clothing, and judging by
not by the fruits but by their words.
Can you see that, and what he– >> Oh, yeah, yeah, absolutely. >> Yeah, and this,
you know, he’s such a wise man, Jefferson, of course, but– and he saw through
Alexander Hamilton, I read a letter, he wrote to Washington.
Washington– Hamilton and Washington were extremely close, you know, throughout the
revolution. And yet, Jefferson had the dignity And to just tell Washington to his
face the lies that Hamilton was saying So he had the courage and wisdom to see
through Hamilton, but he sure couldn’t see through the vice off Yeah But other
fruits you shall know them absolutely All righty. Well, let’s go ahead and we’ll
finish up Oh, we’ll wrap up and we’ll go into open form. If anybody has any
questions or other comments about training, we’ll do that there or anything else you
guys wanna bring up. But let’s have a closing prayer. And Pamela Allen, are you
available to give her a closing prayer?
– Yes, I can. – Awesome, thank you.
– Our Father in Heaven, as we come to the end of this recorded section of our
meeting tonight. We wish to express our gratitude for the work that Ben has done to
bring these things together in the work of the people in the early days who wrote
books to be able to uncover this conspiracy that has gone on for such a long time
and we can understand how people are fooled by the words.
They work very diligently to not be known. We pray,
Heavenly Father, that we will be able to have the courage and the inspiration of
how to uncover these things and to share them with others who will also understand
and see that this is a concerted effort that is going forth and that it is the
work of Satan in his plan to undermine everything that is in the plan of thy son
to bring to pass the immortality and the eternal life of man.
We can see that these Efforts are unfortunately going forward.
Too many people do not believe in the conspiracy. They’re successful in their efforts
to hide themselves and in their efforts to go forth to bring their nefarious plans
to fruition. We pray Heavenly Father that that more and more people will be aware
that they will be prepared to fight, stand up and fight against these things that
we might be able to have the kind of a country and the kind of a world that we
have in our hearts that we know that thy son wants to have as where he is,
there is freedom, there is liberty. And This is the important thing that we would
be able to have our people kept from tyranny and being
captive.
We’re grateful for the blessings we have. We’re grateful for the knowledge that is
being poured out, and we pray that we will be able to act on these things and we
say this in the name of thy Son Jesus Christ amen thank you
