The Surrender of Sovereignty: What ‘Iran Can’t Have Nukes’ Really Means

 Iran: The Globalist Boogeyman

Iran is consistently presented as the “globalist boogeyman,” especially with recent events. This isn’t new. An article from 17 years ago shows Dick Cheney and George W. Bush threatening to act on Iran, with the President unwilling to leave the conflict unresolved. This agenda has been in the works for a long time. In 2004, Condoleezza Rice, another Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member, stated that “Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear arms,” warning that President Bush would use “all the tools that are available to him to stop Iran’s program”. The message is clear: Iran is not allowed to have a nuclear weapon.

This narrative continues. In 2012, Benjamin Netanyahu claimed Iran was “on the brink of a nuclear bomb in six to seven months”. Just two days ago, another article echoed this, with Netanyahu declaring an operation necessary to “roll back the Iranian threat to Israel’s very survival,” stating that Iran could produce a nuclear weapon “in a very short time” if not stopped. This “boogeyman” narrative has persisted for 20 to 30 years.

They constantly bring up arguments about Iran being a “Muslim dictatorship” that does “horrible things to women and children,” and how they “shout death to America and death to Israel,” thus justifying their inability to have a nuclear bomb. But who is promoting this narrative? Those in the Satanic Conspiracy, along with its members and associated roundtable groups such as the Council on Foreign Relations.

So, why is the conspiracy so fixated on disarming Iran, even if they never truly intend to act, perhaps using it as a distraction? We need to understand the real goal when one nation dictates another’s right to possess weapons. Ask yourself: What would happen if Iran, or Russia, or England, or Israel, or any other nation, told the United States it wasn’t allowed to have nuclear weapons anymore? We’d tell them to “pound sand,” right? This is the mindset they’re trying to instill – that certain nations aren’t allowed to defend themselves.

Who Wants War with Iran?

The Satanic globalists want war with Iran. We must understand this when we look at the news and the scare tactics used to garner support for efforts to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

War with Iran is an extension of the “Freedom from War” agenda. This is a U.S. State Department document, “Freedom from War: The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World,” State Department Document 7277, released in September 1961.

State Department Document 7277: The Disarmament Agenda

Let’s delve into State Department Document 7277. It states the goal is “to contain and reduce the nuclear threat,” meaning nations that haven’t agreed to a treaty prohibiting nuclear weaponstesting shall do so, and the “production of fissionable materials for use in weapons shall be stopped”. The ultimate goal is to ensure that all nations, without approval from the United Nations, are not allowed to produce any means of self defense.

Stage two of this program outlines “progressive control disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures of international law” to a point “where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened UN peace force”. One of the primary goals is to prevent any nation from opposing the UN army. They use Orwellian “double-speak” by calling it a “peace force,” but it’s clearly a UN army.

The final phase of the disarmament program aims for a world where “States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order,” and they would also “support and provide agreed manpower for a UN peace force”. This means nations would either not develop anything beyond what they currently have, or they would be forced to get rid of armaments, keeping only what’s necessary to quell dissension against the New World Order within our nation’s borders. If a nation “needs help”, the UN Army can be called in to stop any “rebellion”. Essentially, they want to disarm both nations and individuals to prevent opposition to the UN and to tyrants within their own borders.

Furthermore, the manufacture of armaments for a nation’s internal use would be prohibited, except for “agreed types and quantities to be used by the UN Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order”. All other armaments would be “destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes”. And like all good communists, “peace” means not opposing the New World Order.

This document, State Department Document 7277, is the current policy of both the United Nations and the United States. The conspiracy’s goal is to disarm individuals and nations, taking away their means of self-defense and their ability to declare war on anyone not in compliance.

The Principle of Self-Defense

What’s happening with Iran is a direct reflection of this. The United States, in partnership with Israel, is essentially telling Iran it has “no sovereignty” in terms of what weapons it can possess, and that they will enforce this by force and by death. The principle here, as outlined in State Department Document 7277, is that the UN will be able to disarm any nation so they can’t compete with the military, the United Nations”. This principle also applies to individuals: if the government has the right to disarm nations, then in principle, it has the right to disarm individuals. They’ve explicitly stated this.

This State Department document, 7277, is shocking and still in force. We can see its implementation with what’s happening now with Israel and Iran. This isn’t just about Israel and Iran; it applies universally. The fundamental principle is the right of self-defense. Just because I don’t like my neighbor’s church doesn’t mean I get to take away his guns.  We need to understand “the law of nations“.

The core point is the right of self-defense. You can’t just claim your neighbor is doing something you don’t like and take away their guns. “Self-defense against unjust violence is not only the right, but the duty of a nation and one of her most sacred duties”. “Self-defense being authorized by the law of nature,” it “naturally belongs to everyone and requires no permission”. (See Emer De Vattel, Law Of Nations, 1758)

We don’t need UN permission to defend ourselves if attacked, just as an individual doesn’t need to call the police for permission to defend against a robbery. It is a natural right, and anyone that tries to take it away from you is a tyrant. This applies to nations as well as individuals.

Cato’s Letters, another foundational text for the Founding Fathers, states that “the great principle of self-preservation, which is the first and fundamental law of nature calls for this procedure”. “Whatever is necessary to the public safety is just”.(Cato’s Letters 1:94) “All men have a right to defend themselves”. “There is no law that can be legitimately passed that prevents you from defending yourself”. In fact, “Whoever violates this primary law of nature ought by the law of nature to be destroyed”. (1:291-292) This principle must be applied universally: if someone says another doesn’t have the right to defend themselves, “they’re wrong and they should be destroyed”.

Joseph Smith, in an 1844 letter to his wife, Emma, said: “There is one principle which is eternal. It is the duty of all men to protect their lives and the lives of their household whenever necessity requires and no power has a right to forbid it”. This is an inherent right for both individuals and groups. He also strongly stated that “Any man who will not fight for his wife and children is a coward and a bastard,” (Words of Joseph Smith, BYU Religious Studies Center, pg. 162) emphasizing that self-defense is not just a right, but a duty for individuals and nations.

George Q. Cannon urged, “it is also for your salvation to equip yourselves now”. He suggested having weapons readily available, stating, “there is nothing that the devil is so much afraid of as a weapon of death”. This highlights that the conspiracy fears self-defense, which is why they push for gun bans and promote the lie of “peaceful resistance”. (Journal of Discourses 5:164-165)

Brigham Young similarly stated,

“By what means did [God] keep the mob from destroying us? It was by means of being well armed with the weapons of death to send them to hell cross lots. We must be so prepared that they dare not come to us in a hostile manner without being assured they will meet a vigorous resistance, and ten to one they will meet their grave. I am my own policeman, and have slept, scores of nights, with my gun and sword by my side, that is, if I slept at all. I am still a policeman. Now is the day to watch.” (Journal of Discourses 1:171-172)

Pointing out that the modern local police department is a relatively new invention, and historically, individuals were responsible for defending themselves against mobs.

The End Goal: Global Disarmament under the UN

When we support denying any nation or person the right to defend themselves, we are supporting the “satanic conspiracy’s agenda of disarmament”. The goal, as we’ve seen, is the disarmament of nations. When world leaders say a country “cannot be allowed to own nukes,” they are following this State Department document. They are either knowingly or ignorantly, but most likely knowingly, implementing the New World Order agenda of allowing only the United Nations to have weapons, except for what’s needed to quell internal rebellion.

We need to understand this because many people are acting emotionally, supporting nations like Israel, even when they’re “claiming to be Israel when it’s not”. They say we must “stop these bad guys” because “they have a religion that I really don’t like” or “they’re doing things that I really don’t like”. While Iran may “shout death to America,” if they attack us, we have the right to defend ourselves, and they have every right to defend themselves if attacked. I will protect everyone’s right to defend themselves.

Enslavement and disarmament go hand in hand; ultimately, the goal is to disarm to enslave. Any church that advocates for disarmament is essentially advocating the enslavement of mankind. The arguments often heard on conservative media about Israel and Iran are problematic. They suggest killing people based on their “thoughts” or what they “say they want”. It doesn’t matter how bad the thought is; “nobody should be killed or murdered for their thoughts”. When Iranian comments about wiping Israel off the map are taken in context, they often mean that Israel is an “illegitimate nation” due to its foundations and “war crimes,” not a desire for a new Holocaust. While some may sincerely want that, it is “no grounds to murder somebody”.

The Wisdom of the Founding Fathers: Mind Our Own Business

What was the Founding Fathers’ position on engaging with other nations? It’s encapsulated in John Quincy Adams’ words: “America goes not abroad in search for monsters to destroy”. She is a “well-wisher to the freedom and independence,” but “she is the champion and vindicator only of her own”. We don’t vindicate or champion anyone else’s cause. America “will recommend the general cause by the countenance of her voice and the benign sympathy of her example”.

Adams warned that “by once enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence,” America “would involve herself beyond the power of extrication in all the wars of interest and entry of individual avarice, envy, and ambition”. The “fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly change from liberty to force”. No matter the argument for intervention, the natural result is force. (John Quincy Adams, 4 July 1821)

This is precisely what we’re seeing: the implementation of the United Nations program to disarm the world, allowing only the UN to control global weapons, thus preventing resistance to their tyranny. It’s crucial to understand these principles, not just for current events, but to be aware and beware of the lies promoted by so-called conservatives promoting the globalist agenda. Anyone advocating to “stop Iran from having nuclear weapons” is part of the New World Order, or at least promoting their agenda. They expose themselves as a mouthpiece of the conspiracy and should not be taken seriously.