Fake Pandemic Archives - Tree of Liberty Society

TRANSCRIPT

We have to understand where we are before we can take the necessary steps to move forward.

So: three things the conspiracy fears the most. This is why they attack these three things so heavily. When you try to do these three things, you really get just the brunt of the conspiracy’s wrath—which can be devastating, scary sometimes, and can feel overwhelming. But it’s important for us to work hard and understand what the conspiracy will do, so that way we’re prepared and we’re not deterred.

These things will be refreshers—we’re going to go into them deeper—but these are the three things we must do and that the conspiracy fears.

This is the culture of liberty.

This is what the Founding Fathers did. This is what every society that has liberty has done. And when they get rid of these three things, that is when they are completely under the control of the conspiracy and need to work back at getting these things done.

So:

We need to be economically independent. That’s why the people of Utah were attacked for that.
We need to not submit to unconstitutional government.
We need to have political independence and educational independence.

These are key things to being able to get out of control of the conspiracy.

And as we’ve gone through them—as you’ve probably seen in my presentation before—as we go through these things, it becomes obvious. It’s like, “Okay, that’s why we’re in the situation that we’re in.” And we just think, “Okay, well, we just move forward and we get the right guy”—all the different traditional solutions that we’ve talked about, and why they don’t work.

Then we think that that’s just what we have to do to do it. But no—this is really a groundbreaking thought process and a paradigm shift that we not only have to make regarding what the solutions are, but really what we have to be doing, and why these are so important.

We need to have that economic independence because—like we talked about a few weeks ago with the training on the importance of ownership versus being an employee—if you are dependent, economically speaking, on someone else, then you are going to submit to them to make sure that you continue to be provided for. That you receive the things that you need to be able to sustain your life.

And so that’s just not… So economic independence is a part of that, not just for your maintenance with your job—with what you do to maintain your income—but more broadly than that.

So this is an important thing. It’s why the Saints in Utah were attacked so much, and why when any other culture does these same things, they are attacked as well.

Brigham Young said that the Lord says that we shall never do another day’s work, nor spend another dollar to build up a Gentile city or nation.

So our resources—the goal needs to be—where our resources are only going toward those that are building the cause of liberty. That are fighting for the cause of Christ.

Because, just like we saw during the fake pandemic, if we’re dependent on a business—if we said we could only have the things sold at Harmons—then we were going to have to, to be able to provide for ourselves or to be able to get the things that we said we needed, we were going to have to do the things that Harmons said. Whether it was wear a mask or other things—get a vaccine.

And so we need to be using our resources to not build up companies that are working with the conspiracy—that are part of the conspiracy. We need to be supporting those… All of our money needs to eventually go to companies or individuals that are building liberty, not destroying it.

He says here: “They want the Mormons to build cities for them to possess.”

We see this now with Agenda 21, especially here in the West, in Utah specifically. Not only do we have the culture of liberty, but we have the infrastructure: the grid system, the wide streets, and each housing/property square was self-sufficient—where the individual had enough land to provide for themselves. It wasn’t something that would make people dependent on an outside force to be able to provide for their own needs.

So when we understand this concept of building cities—liberty-type cities—we are building cities that will not lend themselves to the conspiracy’s control.

On another occasion, Brigham Young said:

“We do not intend to have any trade or commerce with the Gentile world. For so long as we buy of them, we are in a degree dependent upon them. The Kingdom of God cannot rise independent of the Gentile nations until we produce, manufacture, and make every article of use, convenience, or necessity amongst our own people. So we shall need no commerce with the nations. I am determined to cut every thread of this kind and live free and independent, untrammeled by any of their detestable customs and practices.”

Now, as we become dependent—we see the different things we’re dependent on. Every aspect. We’re not just talking about government. Even morality is an important part of liberty.

And so we see, as we are dependent upon manufacturers that are part of this globalist system—who are designing clothes intended to decrease the morality of the people—and that’s the only place we can go to for our clothing, then we start to say, “Well, we’re dependent on that, so now we have to adjust our own standards,” because we don’t know how to either do it ourselves or we don’t have a network set up with others who do know how to do those things.

So we’re dependent on them—not only for our food—but for our clothes. And then our own standards will be changed because of that.

We see that through the years. We’re not just saying styles are changing, but the ability to maintain purity and chastity—that can change with styles. You can still maintain purity and chastity with different designs, but we can see now that if you’re getting your clothes from these globalist companies, they’re designed to destroy the morality and chastity of the people.

And so it’s essential that we build this separate economic culture—where we’re not dependent on the conspiracy and its organizations to provide our clothing, our food, our oil.

Right now, we’re so dependent on the conspiracy, who’ve taken over all of the energy production. Now we’re dependent upon them for the prices at the pump—or what they charge for heating our homes.

So it’s essential that we find different ways and we work towards that. Obviously, this isn’t something we can do tomorrow—we wake up and suddenly we’re producing our own clothes, our own energy, our own food.

It’s something we have to recognize has to be done, and then find ways to do it.

But right now we’re first starting off: what is it that needs to be done?

It began here in the West, where the conspiracy was really working hard to bring the railroad through here—because they knew they could use that to change the culture by increasing the population of the anti-liberty people. The people that came here to destroy the culture of liberty.

And we see that the idea of increasing transportation and trade is a way they use to change the culture.

So we see that now in Utah with the Inland Port Authority. It’s a way that, A: destroys our security—because Salt Lake City becomes a port. Meaning it is seen as a coastal city, where anything that comes from China or California to Salt Lake City is treated as if it were sailing through the ocean—no checks, no oversight. That’s one problem with it.

But it also makes us more international—which we’ll talk about in a second—and how that decreases our independence as well.

They saw what we were doing here as a threat, and they needed to destroy it.

It was on the congressional record:

“I charge it to be a crying evil—the people here in Utah—sapping not only the physical constitution of the people practicing it [Mormonism], dwarfing their physical proportions and emasculating their energies…”

They said our belief system changed our physical proportions.

“It is a scarlet whore. It is a reproach to the Christian civilization and deserves to be blotted out.”

So they saw what we were doing as a threat—and they needed to destroy it.

One of the ways they do it—this is Nelson Rockefeller in his book The Future of Federalism—he writes about how they are destroying people’s economic and political independence through a certain means. He says:

“I have long felt that the road toward the unity of free nations lay through regional confederations in the Western Hemisphere and in the Atlantic community—perhaps eventually in Africa, the Middle East, and Asia…”

This was written in the late 1960s.

“Such work toward regional unities is in fact steadily progressing. The common market in Europe is an outstanding example.”

He was saying that what is now the European Union is the model they are trying to build to destroy political independence by first destroying economic independence.

These markets—right now they have the African Union, they have an Asian Union, and one in the Middle East.

And now we have—with NAFTA and the expansion of NAFTA that happened a few years ago—this is what they’re trying to do. What they already did back to Utah, now they’re trying to do to all the nations.

Destroy economic independence, because economic integration leads naturally to political integration, just like what happened with the European Union.

That’s exactly what the head of the CFR, Richard Haass, explained in Foreign Policy Magazine about a decade ago. He said that national sovereignty is diminishing, and this is being done mostly through free trade.

Understanding that—just going back—this was 50 years before: the idea of using these economic blocs, what they call free trade…

Which is where we really differ from a lot of libertarians. They support what they call free trade, despite the fact that all of the agreements like NAFTA and the European Union aren’t actually free trade. They increase regulation and they decrease national independence.

They use trade.

The idea they promote is that “more economic trade between countries means they’re less likely to go to war.” That’s one of their main selling points.

But what it actually does is make you dependent upon them.

Right now, we have no steel manufacturing in the United States. We’ve given up basically our national security over to China, where we get a lot of our metal for our military. And if the conspiracy didn’t control the military, that would be an even bigger problem.

We can see how if we are dependent, it doesn’t actually diminish war. It just makes it so you have to do what the other people say.

Otherwise, you’re going to lose the thing you’ve now become dependent on.

And so they are using this as a major method: the destruction of economic independence, leading to the destruction of political independence.

The post Are You Ready To Step Out Of Your Comfort Zone? appeared first on Tree of Liberty Society.

Independence Now and Independence FOREVER!

Rod Klingler — Fri, 04 Jul 2025 03:45:03 +0000

Do we have the same complaints the Founding Fathers had when they felt drove to rebel against England? No. We have MORE!

This is an excerpt from “Independence Month,” which you can watch in full, for FREE, here: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/cujwjd97pkst6amgyafa0/july-25-2022-independence-month.mp4?rlkey=175ddlkr446hgf0yjedcrjw8m&st=tc0dl2yd&dl=0

Help support ad-free content with a one time donation or becoming a member today.

Thank you to our sponsors

TRANSCRIPT

So what were some key points that were laid out in the Declaration of Independence about why they dissolved their union with the colonies of Great Britain? Because in the Declaration of Independence, they said that these things shouldn’t be done for light and transient purposes. That you can’t just be like, “Oh, you’re mean to me.” It’s got to be something serious. It’s got to be something that—not just because you’re angry—but there’s a real legitimate principled reason for the dissolving.

So they said that the king has erected a multitude of new offices and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance. So now, is that something that we see today? Pulling up new offices, sending out the officers of those offices to harass the people and to take away—to bother the people—and then to take away the things that they have, their substance. I mean, not just going in there and grabbing their food out of their plate, but their ability to be able to provide for their families. This is absolutely—we see the same thing going on today.

Right now, there are at least 345 agencies, government corporations, quasi-official agencies, boards, commissions, etc., which claim authority to write rules for individuals and businesses. None of these people are elected. None of these people are accountable. And in fact, the government doesn’t even know how many employees are a part of this system. They don’t even know. And so we have the same thing here—maybe even more so. I don’t know if the king had 345 different of these agencies out there. We’ve been able to find new ways to harass people.

And then we have examples of this. The feds come in and they arrest a family using the Commerce Clause of the vile… of the Constitution, saying, “Hey, you’re not allowed to sell raw milk.” So the federal government came into a local community and threw them in prison—just simply because—and ruined their ability to feed their families simply because they had the audacity to sell milk that still has vitamins in it.

We have OSHA. This is just last year—or this year, I’m sorry, January of this year—is fining workplaces over $13,500 for every infraction to accommodate President Biden’s vaccine mandate. So that never came to fruition, but that was something that they were prepared and ready to do. And it’s something that there’s a version of that’s happening all of the time to different businesses throughout the country. So yeah, they are—just like—they are eating out our substance.

Four companies accused of violating COVID-19 health protocols are fined by OSHA. So because they didn’t enforce mask mandates, they were fined by OSHA. So they’re eating out our substance. We’re seeing the same thing.

So another one: the king has affected to render the military independent and superior to the civil power. Okay, so meaning—he took it away from the Parliament even—and their ability to be able to dispatch the military—and took it to himself, as an individual, to be able to decide when the military is used.

So in the Constitution, the military is supposed to be under the civil power—meaning you have a Congress that has to declare war for the executive branch to be able to direct the military for a space of two years. And beyond—even closer to the civil power—the local people, you have the National Guard, and it should be the militias (that don’t exist right now, unconstitutionally). Your local governors were the ones that were supposed to be the ones that sent them out. And they could nullify—they could say, “No, this is an unjust war. This is improper,” and they wouldn’t send them out. So that’s what we have now.

But just like the king did during the 1700s, we have the president sending out 10,000 troops to Afghanistan as Taliban forces… So instead of Congress doing this, we have the executive branch doing it. He says Biden is boosting U.S. troops in Europe because of Russia’s war in Ukraine. So instead of Congress declaring a war and our local leaders sending out the local militia to fight these foreign battles, the president is rendering the military independent and superior to the civil power. This has happened over and over again. You have other presidents—they called up the National Guard and directed them to the Middle East under the direction of the presidency and the United Nations, and not under the civil power.

Our military has been sent up to Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Syria, Somalia, Bosnia, Yugoslavia, Ukraine, Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Nicaragua—tons and tons of different places. Our military has been sent out under the direction of what would be the equivalent of the king or president, instead of the civil power.

So: “He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution and unacknowledged by our laws, giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation.” So now our government has signed us up to over—almost—90 different foreign institutions, subjecting us to their laws—making it… well, their pretend legislation—making us obey, making us assent to the United Nations, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the G20, the NAFTA, the new version, USMCA, NATO, and dozens upon dozens of other international bodies that are telling us what to do and making rules for individual businesses and families to obey.

So the family would obey it—but not directly. They’re not realizing that they’re getting a directive from the United Nations or the World Bank. But their loaning system, the regulations on why their house was built, for example—these are all done under international regulations. And so we are being forced to assent to these organizations’ pretend legislation.

So now, another thing that was a claim against the crown was transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses. So we have U.S. citizens who are being held prisoner in Guantanamo Bay and other foreign prisons without due process. And there are other prisons that we have and we’ll be talking about.

So Christie asked, when was the last time our country went to war legally? That was during World War II—it was the last time war was declared by Congress. So it’s been a while.

“He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us.” Just the most recent example of this—this has happened throughout the years though—is: I did a video, I did a report exposing how I could prove that the government was behind the riots that we had in 2020. They are exciting—the government is stirring up and directing and organizing insurrections among those terrorist attacks amongst us.

So how do we come to a dissolving again? Amongst those which join together to form a government in a country, it is absolutely requisite that there be a perfect consent and agreement concerning the use of the means of government. If they do not agree, they will clash. Right? This is what we’re seeing today. This is a clear parallel that we see going on, that we can see. You don’t have to be a prophet. You don’t have to be able to see into the future. You just have these things that people have noticed. Right? Isaac Newton didn’t invent prophecy—gravity—he discovered it. He was able to explain it.

And so the same thing here. What we’re saying is that, well, you know, it’s come to a point in the United States that it’s not even like, “Hey, this is going to happen.” This is happening right now. Everything that we’re seeing is happening. It’s leading to these clashes that were talked about.

And so John Adams—it was something that they understood. And so what did he say when he saw these things happening? We had all of those things that the Founding Fathers listed as their grievances against the crown, listed in the Declaration of Independence. I encourage everyone to go back and read that if they haven’t.

He gave a talk—and this was what’s interesting—this was before the Declaration of Independence. Okay, a lot of times people think that the war started after the Declaration of Independence. But the Founding Fathers recognized that even though a war hadn’t been declared, that the crown had declared war on them through his actions.

And I mentioned this before, just the last couple of weeks—we need to start to realize that the war on us has already begun. We just have to recognize it. It’s already started.

“If we postpone independence, do we mean to carry on or to give up the war? Do we mean to submit to the measures of Parliament, Boston Port Bill and all?” Are we going to postpone? Are we going to give this up? Are we going to say, “Oh, we’re going to get hopium and say that this is going to get better later on?” “Do we mean to submit and consent that we ourselves shall be ground to powder and our country and its rights trodden down in the dust?”

“The war, then, must go on.” Because they’re not going to do that. “We must fight it through. And if the war must go on, why put off longer the Declaration of Independence?” That measure will strengthen us.

So he was selling the idea of having a Declaration of Independence. And he says, this isn’t going to cause more problems for us. These problems are already here. And that’s what we see a lot of times today is, “Hey, you calling out the conspirators, you saying what they’re doing is bad, is going to cause more problems.” No, the problems are already here. We need to stop the gaslighting of saying, “Hey, we’re just going to try to make nice with these people.” They’ve already declared war on us. Calling it for what it is—it’s only going to strengthen us.

“It is my living sentiment, and by the blessing of God, it shall be my dying sentiment: Independence now and independence forever.”

And it was this talk—amongst others—that was able to help build support for what needed to happen. There was no reconciliation. There was nothing that could be done to bring the colonies back under British rule. The people had recognized what was going on, and the king was just getting more and more tyrannical. And the only thing to do was to be trodden down or to leave.

The post Independence Now and Independence FOREVER! appeared first on Tree of Liberty Society.

The Anti-Conspiracy Conspiracy

Rod Klingler — Sun, 29 Jun 2025 03:00:41 +0000

“There’s no such thing as a conspiracy! And we know that because some dark, shadowy group of unnamed individuals is trying to make you believe that there is!” Ummm… If you have a partially-functioning brain, that language ought to raise some red flags. Find out why!

This is an excerpt from “UN & Corporate Media Declare Information War,” which you can watch in full, for FREE, here: https://treeoflibertysociety.com/un-corporate-media-declare-information-war/

Help support ad-free content with a one time donation or becoming a member today.

Thank you to our sponsors

TRANSCRIPT

Another one is pre-bunking and debunking. Now, you want to remember this terminology because it’s used in actual articles out there. So we want to pre-bunk and debunk the conspiracy theories.

Be warned:
The COVID-19 pandemic has seen a rise in harmful and misleading conspiracy theories. It may be difficult to recognize them.

They keep on saying the same thing. Stopping the spread of conspiracy theories is challenging—because they’re full of facts. There is no one-size-fits-all approach. It depends on the level of exposure. So, for each person, you have to decide how informed they are—to see whether you just call them names or try to trick them into believing you.

“People who firmly believe in conspiracy theories are extremely difficult to reach.” I find that hilarious. They’re already saying that if you’ve come to understand the facts behind this conspiracy to destroy freedom, you’re going to be hard to reach. So we should just call you a name and move on.

Level One: Low Exposure

If someone has low exposure to conspiracy theories, we need to pre-bunk them—empower them to be more resilient. Warn people early that a conspiracy theory exists. Encourage rational thinking, questioning, and fact-checking.

That’s the gaslighting—pretending to encourage investigation. “We’re not hiding it from you,” they say.

Alert people about the arguments behind the most common COVID-19 conspiracy theories and the key traits of conspiratorial thinking:
– Suspicion of official accounts
– Immunity to contrary evidence
– Reinterpreting random events as part of a broader pattern

I love how it says “reinterpreting random events.” In other words, there is no such thing as connected events. Everything is random. “Don’t you dare think these things are connected.”

Debunking

Facts and logic matter.
Dos:
– Focus on the facts you want to communicate, not the myth you want to debunk. (Don’t give free advertising to the real issue.)
– Choose your target: the author, source, or logic behind the theory. (Focus on ad hominem—attack the person, not the idea.)
– Always state clearly that the information is wrong before quoting the conspiracy theory. (You’ll see this in articles.)
– Provide a fact-based alternative explanation (which they rarely do—“the science says” is often the only backup).
– Use visual aids. Simple images. Because people are stupid.

Like “Two weeks to flatten the curve.” What an amazing graph—there were no metrics. It was just a curve and some words.

Don’ts:
– Don’t focus on the conspiracy theory first. Don’t reinforce it.
– Don’t overwhelm with information. Don’t give facts someone might research and think about.
– Just give simple conclusions, then walk away.

Six Things Conspiracy Theories Have in Common

A secret plot
A group of conspirators
Supporting evidence
The idea that nothing happens by accident
A belief that the world is good vs. evil
Someone is to blame

So, in contrast, their message is:
– There’s no secret plot.
– No group of conspirators.
– No evidence.
– Everything is random.
– The world is gray.
– No one is to blame.

Is This a Conspiracy Theory?

Probably not, if:
– The author has “recognized qualifications.” (i.e., trained by the system)
– Sources are backed by fact-checking sites (which are themselves just websites with no accountability)
– The tone is “objective and factual” (even if the language isn’t)

I don’t know how tone can be factual. They just don’t want emotion. You can’t sound alarmed—even if you’re stating facts. Your tone has to sound calm, matter-of-fact, even when you’re exposing serious issues.

How Do Conspiracy Theories Cause Harm?

They claim:
– Identifying an enemy can fuel discrimination
– Spreading mistrust leads to apathy or radicalization
– Undermining science and law damages society

Ben:
“Isn’t that exactly what they did to the John Birch Society?”
Absolutely. They painted them as radicals. They want to discourage any group from exposing who they are.

How Should Journalists Report?

This is their marching orders to journalists:

– Use reliable, verified sources
– Do not reinforce conspiracy theories
– Emphasize core facts (i.e., the official narrative)
– Warn readers about related conspiracy theories before referencing them
– Don’t explain the theory. Just explain how it goes against “the science”
– Use the same emotional language: “science deniers,” “extremists,” etc.

There’s a quote from a Deseret News article titled “The Weaponization of Doubt: American Science Is Under Attack.”

That’s war language. Science is under attack. This is their religion. It’s not just information—it’s belief. When you criticize evolution, vaccines, or climate change, you’re not challenging data; you’re attacking the faith of the state.

The article says:

“There are forces at work who want us to believe false things about the climate, COVID-19, evolution, and GMOs.”

All of these are their sacred cows. To question any one of them is heresy. And yet, they give no evidence. They just say there’s a conspiracy against science.

They even mention “Jewish space lasers.” That’s how they shut down questions—attach something absurd or offensive, and ignore it entirely.

They reference Gates and vaccine microchips, which is ironic since one of his actual ventures is ID2020. There’s a USA Today article that claims Agenda 21 isn’t real—even though you can literally buy the Agenda 21 book published by the United Nations on Amazon.

They say:

“These theories are part of a deliberate propaganda campaign to create distrust.”

So they’re admitting there’s a war—a war of ideas.

“It’s not a free speech issue. Words are dangerous.”

If you say sodomy is wrong, you’re not expressing belief—you’re causing real harm, they say.

They also say:

“All science deniers reason the same way.”

Which is ridiculous. Nobody reasons identically. And they never explain how this reasoning is flawed.

They accuse:
– Cherry-picking evidence (without showing examples)
– Believing conspiracy theories
– Using illogical reasoning (but offer no proof)
– Relying on “fake experts” (i.e., anyone unapproved)
– Believing science has to be perfect to be credible

Then they say:

“We must remove the pump handle giving people the disease of disinformation.”

That’s metaphorical language for eliminating the source. Which implies the person is the source. This is war language.

“One way to do this is to pre-bunk…”

Straight from the UN’s playbook. Publicize flawed reasoning and shame people. Make them feel like victims who’ve been duped—then rebuild them in your image.

They are masters of psychology. But once you understand the tactics, you can teach others to recognize them too.

One person shares this story:

“When I realized how much false history I’d learned and was teaching my kids, I felt guilty and determined to stop. I started noticing what narratives the media pushes, then flipped it around and researched the other side.”

You begin to see what they really care about by what they push repeatedly. One mom said:

“My daughter was in middle school and the teacher had a whole lesson on debunking the moon landing deniers. She didn’t even know that was a thing. That’s how they pre-bunk. They plant the seed early—so that if you ever meet someone with a different view, you already reject it.”

The article ends with this line:

“We are in an information war. And the first step to winning an information war is to admit that it’s well underway.”

That right there is very revealing.

The post The Anti-Conspiracy Conspiracy appeared first on Tree of Liberty Society.

What If The Government Decides What You Believe?

Rod Klingler — Sat, 28 Jun 2025 03:00:17 +0000

How does the government attempt to control how you think and feel about world events? Is there anything you can do about it? Find out! This is an excerpt from “UN & Corporate Media Declare Information War,” which you can watch in full, for FREE, here: https://treeoflibertysociety.com/un-corporate-media-declare-information-war/

Help support ad-free content with a one time donation or becoming a member today.

Thank you to our sponsors

TRANSCRIPT

We go to the United Nations website and their new program to stop conspiracy theories. They need to stop the spread of conspiracy, right? And they’ve got this whole hashtag campaign: #ThinkBeforeSharing. It says the COVID pandemic has sparked a worrying rise in disinformation and conspiracy theories.

“Conspiracy theories can be dangerous.” So it’s not even about free speech, because of course we can’t allow certain speech—because certain speech is dangerous. They often target and discriminate against vulnerable groups, ignore specific evidence, and polarize society with serious consequences. This needs to stop.

And so on this website, they put together some videos and some infographics to be able to help you better understand how to fight this conspiracy disinformation. I think that we should do it soon. I think that’s a good idea. Thank you.

There are several things in there that are important for us to focus on, right? Because they are linking questioning the COVID narrative with science denying.

So the term science denier, right? That is a charged term that is used on purpose because in people’s minds, it triggers the idea of being a Holocaust denier. If you’re a science denier, that’s the same as a Holocaust denier. And if you’re a Holocaust denier, that means you think that Hitler is great and that you want to kill the Jews.

So that’s one part of it—this disinformation campaign to get people to stick with the narrative because they don’t want to be considered to be anti-Semites and they don’t want to be thought of as people that like Hitler. So that’s one part of it, right?

And then also, linking the hate. It talks about at the end, especially—it says, don’t spread hate. So if you are helping people to understand what’s going on with the fake pandemic, you are engaged in hate—whether it’s against ethnicities, whether it’s against religions, whether it’s against sodomites. It’s all connected.

That’s another way that they want to protect the narrative, by linking it to these other ideas.

Hey Ben.
Yeah?
I find it ironic that they’re asking you to do exactly what you really should do. I mean, check the facts. Check the author. Find out—dig deeper. And that’s exactly what people are doing. They’re actually uncovering the conspiracy.
But that’s what they’re telling you to do—right? Thinking that you’re not going to really do that.
Right. Because then if you question the narrative, you’re like, “Oh, what I’m studying is making me question the narrative. That must mean I hate Jews. Therefore, I can’t question the narrative.”

The last time that they said how to spot fake news or whatever, they had this video release, and it was basically just like:
“Did the mainstream media say it?
Well then that means it’s not fake.
Government or mainstream media—it’s not fake.
It’s automatically good.”

And they put together these infographics because you’re too stupid to understand. That’s actually one of the things they talk about—is to be as simple as possible.

So I want to break down these things because we need to understand the messaging—because I’m going to show you in a minute how it’s being used. Just like with those other examples, the media is doing as they’re told.

So: conspiracy theories are dangerous. So he’s got a match, right? He is going to cause harm. So this is no longer about free speech. If you are questioning the narrative, you are dangerous. Just questioning the narrative is dangerous.

Be warned:
The COVID-19 pandemic has seen a rise in harmful and misleading conspiracy theories.
It may be difficult to recognize them or know how best to deal with them…

Because, you know, when you deal with facts, it’s hard to debunk them. And so it’s hard to recognize when you’re dealing with a conspiracy or not.

So: conspiracy theories often target or discriminate against an entire group perceived as the enemy behind a real or imagined threat. Again, they’re trying to pigeonhole you. They polarize society and fuel violent extremism.

If you question the narrative, you are fueling violent extremism.

While most people who spread conspiracy theories genuinely believe them, others deploy them cynically to achieve these effects. So if you’re believing them, you’re just a sucker falling for people that are purposely, knowingly lying to you. That’s the idea that they’re trying to put in your head.

And so, how do I identify? How do I identify?

And of course they call it a conspiracy theory because they want to associate these things with things that—they’re all ours. It can’t be proven. It’s just a theory—as opposed to the idea that it can be… it’s a fact.

They identify an enemy and a secret plot that threatens people’s lives or beliefs and spark a defense mechanism, which can fuel discrimination, justify hate crimes, and can be exploited by violent extremist groups.

They spread mistrust in public institutions, which can lead to political apathy or radicalization.

So this is what we’ve been talking about for the past several weeks especially—that they are obsessed with their own legitimacy. We have to think of them as legitimate people. Because if we don’t think of them as legitimate, they lose their power. And so they’re telling you—they’re telling you that you cannot question their legitimacy. Otherwise: X, Y, Z.

They spread mistrust in scientific and medical information, which can have serious consequences. So, you know, if you don’t trust the medical industry, you’re killing other people. So watch out.

Perceived outgroups of society are especially prone to be targets of conspiracy theories, hate speech and disinformation campaigns. This includes people of different origin—I don’t know what that means. Different origin. They’re probably meaning national origin.

“Don’t you know everyone is born of the same woman? Oh no. What if you came from a different origin?”
“What if nonsense came out of your mouth?”

Religion or sexual orientation—right? So question the COVID narrative means, yeah, it’s all linked together.

In the context of COVID-19, specific groups were frequently falsely blamed for the spread of the virus in Europe, including people of assumed Asian origin, Jews, Muslims, Roma—I don’t know what that is—and people who identify as sodomites.

I don’t know why the Jews and Muslims in Italy were blamed for the pandemic. The only thing I heard about was the Asian hate. Remember that whole thing that they were saying: stop Asian hate?

I only heard stop Asian hate. I never witnessed Asian hate. But the media was pushing it down your throat.

The post What If The Government Decides What You Believe? appeared first on Tree of Liberty Society.

How Does The Conspiracy Trick Us Every Day?

Rod Klingler — Mon, 28 Apr 2025 03:00:25 +0000

What makes some people immediately post Ukraine flags on their Facebook profile? Why are some people excited to add a new stripe to the 2SLGBTQIAWXYZ+ flag? The conspiracy uses a little-known trick called False Righteousness. Find out what it is, in this video! This is an excerpt from the Extremists Liberty Bootcamp. Take the whole course – for FREE – here: https://treeoflibertysociety.com/courses/liberty-bootcamp/lessons/natural-law/.

Help support ad-free content with a one time donation or becoming a member today.

Thank you to our sponsors

TRANSCRIPT

Now, the false righteousness, the immorality and falsehoods masquerading as a morally superior position, or fact, the conspiracy will double down on their lives to combat this inconvenient truth, and they will and the inconvenient truth does not exist, or if faced with the inconvenient truth will fraudulently debunk it, and by repetition, the lie will become more and more believable over time.

Sigmund Freud started off with the sodomite supremacy movement saying homosexuality is assuredly no advantage, but it is nothing to be ashamed of, no vice, no degradation, it cannot be classified as an illness.

And then we have, of course, the lie that these things are safe and effective, even though the government’s own program has paid out billions of dollars for this safe and effective literal godsend.

False righteousness about, of course, global climate change, and then you have the drought has drastically used in Utah, we had flooding, we had flooding last year, and they said that the drought was reduced.

And then we have, of course, equating forced mask mandates as being the same as the Savior himself demanding the destruction of what he fought for before the world was.

The post How Does The Conspiracy Trick Us Every Day? appeared first on Tree of Liberty Society.

How The Conspiracy Tricks You With False Choices!

Rod Klingler — Sun, 27 Apr 2025 03:00:37 +0000

Will you pick Conspiracist A or Conspiracist B? “Heads we win, tails you lose!” Hurry, you must choose! This may be the most important vote of your life! Etc, etc, ad nauseam. STOP FALLING FOR IT! This is an excerpt from the Extremists Liberty Bootcamp. Take the whole course – for FREE – here: https://treeoflibertysociety.com/courses/liberty-bootcamp/lessons/natural-law/.

Help support ad-free content with a one time donation or becoming a member today.

Thank you to our sponsors

TRANSCRIPT

So the controlled argument, false concepts used for this tactic is, of course, only approved narratives are allowed.

When you look in the controlled media, whether it’s left or right, there’s only acceptable narratives.

The fact that they are facing conspiracy, for example, is not one of the accepted narratives.

It’s always about those darn leftists or those RINOS.

It’s never the fact that there’s actual conspiracy working to destroy liberty.

We have the strawman argument and we have false choices.

So these are the three that we’re going to get into right now explaining what that means, the approved narratives.

An example of an improved narrative, right?

We have these individuals who are the choices that are presented to us.

These are the acceptable narratives.

We have scientific consensus.

The earth’s climate is warming.

And we have experts agree that the Inflation Reduction Act accomplishes a lot for small business and working families.

And then you get into the opposite, false opposition left and right with that.

And so this gets you into your corners of left versus right.

If we don’t support this, the Democrats are going to go off the deep end.

And so we’ve got to support whatever the Republicans are doing to stop these things like the Inflation Reduction Act or the conservative solution to climate change.

And so it makes it look like The actual conclusion is legitimate.

It’s just the way that we get there is where the debate is.

And so that third option of, no, the conclusion with what this is based on is a complete fraud to begin with, the third option.

We also have the straw man, the controlled argument.

And this attempts to distract from and discredit an opponent’s beliefs by presenting them in an unfair and actually an inaccurate light.

So to we’re going to, we have a little cartoon here, little comic that lays this out where you have the first individual saying, um, you want to go get some hamburgers?

Strawman says, can we get some pizza?

So the reaction, the straw man is what? You’re saying that we should only ever eat pizza?

That we should just burn down all hamburger stores?

No, that’s a very inaccurate representation of what I said, right?

Because you didn’t want hamburgers that one time. the straw man is you never want hamburgers for the rest of your life and that we need to destroy anybody that sells hamburgers and so that’s that’s an example of a straw man argument that is used by the conspiracy to discredit individuals they’ll say something like if there’s a conspiracy they’re going to say oh you think everyone’s the conspirator as opposed you know instead of saying well of course there are conspiracies that’s just a fact.

They want to discredit the idea that a conspiracy even exists by making it look like you think everybody is a conspirator.

Then we have false choices, the argument using purposely hidden assumptions to control others’ perceived options.

They frame the debate to offer a narrowed set of options when in fact, other and of course better ways actually exist.

And often the choices are marketed as opposing but are not significantly different.

They accept the premise and they’re just arguing on how to get to that end premise, right?

And so we have examples of how you’re going to protect yourself from the coronavirus.

And I’m not a lawyer.

I can’t answer your question about legislation, said the legislator that’s writing the bill.

If you don’t vote Republican, the Democrats will win.

Are you voting Republican or Democrat. These false choices that are out there.

So the false choices, Republican versus Democrat, right? Of course, if you don’t vote Republican, the Democrats are going to win. It’s a false choice, not recognizing that they’re both on the same team.

Of course, the conspiracy is going to approve that narrative. Ivermectin versus the vaccine.

How are we going to fight COVID, right?

Well, the fact that that’s they’re both agreeing that COVID is a problem as opposed to the flu, that and there was no actually increased deaths.

So there’s no reason to treat the situation any differently than you normally would, but they wanna make it about the COVID is legitimate and so are you gonna get vaccinated or are you gonna get the Ivermectin or something else?

It’s still the preconceived notion that the coronavirus is a real problem.

And of course, the conspiracy is going to approve this argument because it makes everybody agree on the narrative.

So then we also have false choices, working isn’t, capitalism isn’t working, you have stop the steal, my body, my choice, how vaccine foes co -opted the abortion, rallying, cry, you have children, protect children, not guns, my body, my choice.

And so all of these different things out there where they have these fake arguments where if you’re against abortion, if you’re in support of life, that means you’re not in favor of choice or you’re not in favor of agency, etc.

And so if you like the Second Amendment, you want to protect your family, you want to protect your children, that means you’re against children.

And so they have these false choices out there.

The post How The Conspiracy Tricks You With False Choices! appeared first on Tree of Liberty Society.

Exploring The Mysterious Order Of Skull And Bones Society

Rod Klingler — Sun, 20 Apr 2025 13:45:11 +0000

In this video: learn about this secret society’s initiation rites, some high-profile members, and their unified stance on controversial issues. Get the book the powers that shouldn’t be are afraid for you to read at https://treeoflibertysociety.com/invasionbook/.

Help support ad-free content with a one time donation or becoming a member today.

Thank you to our sponsors